evidoria

What works in France

All catalogues

96
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 88 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for France

France has implemented mandatory gender-equality reporting and enforcement mechanisms, with France's Professional Equality Index requiring companies with 50+ employees to publish annual gender-equality scores, resulting in average scores rising from 84/100 (2020) to 88/100 (2023), and over 93% of firms now exceeding the 75-point compliance threshold. The country also launched a comprehensive national action plan on domestic violence, with France's 2019 Grenelle against domestic violence producing 54 measures, 52 of which were fully implemented, including more than doubling emergency shelter capacity (5,000 to 11,200+ places) and training 180,000 police officers. However, the evidence in the CONTEXT focuses on national policy frameworks and corporate compliance rather than outcome data on actual gender equity gaps or violence reduction rates.

Drawn from: Plan d’égalité des genres 2022 – 2024 (Gender Equality Plan) · Gender Equality in the Workplace - Orange · Grenelle contre les violences conjugales (France, 2019) · France's Professional Equality Index (Index d'égalité professionnelle) — Mandatory Gender Pay Score · KERING-Stratégie du Devellopment Durable · Equality of Women in Decision Making post - ICADE · SODEXO - DIVERSITÉ , EQUITÉ ET INCLUSION · Gender Diversity in Leaders Structure - GECINA

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +44 pts 88 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +23 pts 73 here · 50 average

Curator validation +17 pts 92 here · 74 average

Impact on gender equality +14 pts 94 here · 80 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 89 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +12 pts 89 here · 77 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +11 pts 65 here · 54 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Evaluated outcomes +10 pts 94 here · 84 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +10 pts 60 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Sustainability +9 pts 87 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured results -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 18 here · 28 average

Equity & inclusion -10 pts 42 here · 52 average

Evaluation evidence -22 pts 22 here · 45 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
88 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
73 · 50
Curator validation
92 · 74
Impact on gender equality
94 · 80
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 76
Effectiveness
89 · 77
Transparency, fairness & accountability
65 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
58 · 48
Evaluated outcomes
94 · 84
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
60 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Sustainability
87 · 78
Achievement / evidence
94 · 91
Innovation level
66 · 63
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Transferability / replicability
62 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
39 · 37
Scalability
62 · 64
Governance, certification & transferability
62 · 64
Demonstrated reach
72 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
37 · 42
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Documented learning
67 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured results
50 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
18 · 28
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Evaluation evidence
22 · 45

Coloured bar: France. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Plan d’égalité des genres 2022 – 2024 (Gender Equality Plan) · 100

Gender Equality in the Workplace - Orange · 100

Grenelle contre les violences conjugales (France, 2019) · 96

France's Professional Equality Index (Index d'égalité professionnelle) — Mandatory Gender Pay Score · 96

KERING-Stratégie du Devellopment Durable · 96

Equality of Women in Decision Making post - ICADE · 96

SODEXO - DIVERSITÉ , EQUITÉ ET INCLUSION · 96

Gender Diversity in Leaders Structure - GECINA · 96

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in France concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more