evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

GRASS — Verified Carbon Revenue Reaches Communal Rangeland Farmers in South Africa

South Africa · Matatiele · See the South Africa profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 4% 73/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

TASC and Meat Naturally Africa's GRASS project issued 266,255 Verra VM0042/CCB-certified carbon units for regenerative grazing on 95,000+ ha of communal rangeland in South Africa's Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal, paying the first R2.7 million to 15 farming communities in 2026.

266255 tCO2e (VCUs)
Verified carbon units issued (2021-2023)
95000 ha
Communal rangeland covered (initial phase) (2021-2023)
2.7 million ZAR
First carbon revenue payout (August 2026)
15
Communities receiving first payout (August 2026)
56.4 million ZAR
Additional income from livestock market access
2000000 ha; ~14 million tonnes CO2e over 30 years
2030 scale-up target (unverified)
GRASS — Verified Carbon Revenue Reaches Communal Rangeland Farmers in South Africa

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
TASC; Meat Naturally Africa
Period
2021-2026
Keywords
regenerative grazing, communal rangeland restoration, carbon finance, livestock market access

Context

Communal rangelands around Matatiele in South Africa's Eastern Cape and neighbouring KwaZulu-Natal were degraded by decades of unmanaged grazing. TASC (a carbon project developer) partnered with the social enterprise Meat Naturally Africa to restore them through the GRASS project, combining regenerative grazing management with improved livestock market access.

Objectives

Register the first grassland carbon project globally under Verra's VM0042 methodology for improved agricultural land management, generate verified carbon revenue for communal farmers, and pair it with better livestock market access via mobile auctions and abattoirs.

Activities

Regenerative grazing management was implemented across more than 95,000 hectares of initial-phase communal rangeland spanning roughly 180 communities and nearly 10,000 farmers, with a revenue-sharing model giving communities over 50% of net carbon revenue in the first decade, rising to 80% by year 20. Meat Naturally also describes 'contextual fire management' across a wider ~400,000-hectare communal landscape.

Results

The first monitoring period (2021-2023) generated 266,255 independently verified carbon units, the first grassland carbon credits worldwide to carry Verra's CCB label. In August 2026, TASC and Meat Naturally distributed the first real revenue tranche: R2.7 million to 15 participating communities. Farmers also reported R56.4 million in additional income from improved livestock market access.

Conclusions

TASC's ambition to scale to 2 million hectares by 2030 (~14 million tonnes CO2e over 30 years) is explicitly stated in the source as 'a target, not yet a verified result.' No independently quantified fire-risk-reduction figures, nor standalone biodiversity/soil field metrics, have been published to support the CCB label's implied co-benefits.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Carbon project registration, MRV (site monitoring, verification audits) and community revenue-sharing administration across ~180 communities; exact project budget not disclosed in source.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — First monitoring period 2021-2023, first payout 2026, multi-decade revenue-sharing schedule (rising community share to 80% by year 20) and a 30-year, 2030-2050-horizon mitigation ambition.
Staffing & skills
carbon project developer (TASC), Meat Naturally Africa field/community-liaison staff, communal grazing committees across ~180 communities, third-party Verra verifiers

Conditions for success

  • formal Verra VM0042/CCB registration and independent verification
  • transparent revenue-sharing agreement with communal governance structures
  • parallel livestock-market-access support (mobile auctions/abattoirs) so income is not solely carbon-dependent

Common failure modes

  • 2030 scale-up (2M ha) is an unverified target; delivery risk if carbon-price or verification capacity does not scale with area
  • fire-risk-reduction and biodiversity/soil co-benefits implied by the CCB label are not independently quantified

Where it fits

Governance type
communal land tenure with NGO/private carbon-developer partnership
Scale
regional (Eastern Cape/KwaZulu-Natal, ~95,000 ha initial phase)
Income level
low/lower-middle-income rural communities

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful