evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Zaï Pits — Farmer-Led Water-Harvesting Restoration of Degraded Cropland, Yatenga, Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso · Ouahigouya · See the Burkina Faso profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 9% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

From 1980, farmer Yacouba Sawadogo revived zaï planting pits in Burkina Faso's Yatenga province, helping plots reach ~1,500 kg/ha of millet/sorghum vs under 500 kg/ha untreated, and turning 27 ha of barren land into a 60+ species forest, per CIRAD/INERA/ISRA.

≈1,500 kg/ha
Millet/sorghum yield on zaï-treated plots (per agronomist reporting)
<500 kg/ha
Millet/sorghum yield on untreated, crusted soil (per agronomist reporting)
50–200 % uplift vs untreated
Wider Sahel yield uplift range reported in academic reviews (multi-site, multi-season)
≈27 ha
Barren land converted to forest by Sawadogo (1980–2023)
60+ species
Tree and bush species now on the restored land (as of laureate profile)
≈380 hours/ha (≈50 hours/ha with animal-drawn tine)
Hand-digging labour requirement (per independent review)
Zaï Pits — Farmer-Led Water-Harvesting Restoration of Degraded Cropland, Yatenga, Burkina Faso

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Association pour la Promotion des Zaï
Period
1980–present
Keywords
dryland agriculture, land restoration, soil and water conservation, drought resilience

Context

Zaï are traditional planting pits, roughly 20–30 cm wide and deep, dug into crusted, degraded cropland before the rains and filled with manure or compost so that scarce rainfall and nutrients concentrate exactly where a millet or sorghum seed is planted. Farmer Yacouba Sawadogo, from Gourga near Ouahigouya in Burkina Faso's Yatenga province, revived and refined the technique from 1980 onward after severe Sahelian droughts.

Activities

Sawadogo added organic matter to the ancestral pits and, from 1984, organised annual 'zaï markets' that drew farmers from over a hundred villages to exchange seeds and know-how, spreading the practice through the farmer-led Association pour la Promotion des Zaï.

Results

Agronomists from CIRAD, INERA and ISRA report that zaï-treated plots in the Sahel can yield around 1,500 kg of millet or sorghum per hectare, compared with under 500 kg/ha on untreated, crusted soil, though other academic reviews of zaï across the wider Sahel report a broader range of roughly 50–200% yield uplift depending on site and season. On his own land, Sawadogo used the method to convert about 27 hectares of barren ground into forest now hosting more than 60 tree and bush species.

Conclusions

The practice is labour-intensive — about 380 hours per hectare by hand, reduced to roughly 50 hours with animal-drawn tine adaptations — and requires around three tonnes of manure per hectare, which independent reviews flag as the main barriers to wider adoption. Sawadogo's work was recognised internationally as UNCCD Global Dryland Champion (2013) and UNEP Champion of the Earth (2020) before his death in December 2023.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
individual smallholder farmers, Association pour la Promotion des Zaï (farmer-led), agronomic researchers (CIRAD, INERA, ISRA) documenting outcomes

Conditions for success

  • access to manure/compost (≈3 tonnes/ha)
  • labour availability before the rains (≈380 hours/ha by hand)
  • farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange through annual 'zaï markets'

Common failure modes

  • high labour burden without animal-drawn tine adaptation limits adoption at scale
  • manure requirement can be a binding constraint for land-poor or livestock-poor farmers

Where it fits

Governance type
informal, farmer-led, non-certified
Scale
smallholder plot to village/provincial spread
Income level
low-income

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful