evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

GTS Institutes — Denmark's National Technology-Diffusion Network for SMEs

Denmark · Copenhagen · See the Denmark profile · See the Copenhagen profile

Top 42% 71/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Denmark's seven GTS institutes are non-profit bodies under multi-year government performance contracts to diffuse applied technological knowledge to Danish firms; in 2024 they served 20,648 companies, 89% of them SMEs, on a combined turnover above 4.3 billion DKK.

Details

Promoter
GTS — Godkendte Teknologiske Serviceinstitutter (Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science)
Period
2021-2024
Keywords
applied research, technology diffusion, SME support, testing and standards

Description

The Godkendt Teknologisk Service (GTS) scheme designates seven independent, non-profit Danish research institutes — including the Danish Technological Institute (founded in Copenhagen in 1906), FORCE Technology, DHI, Bioneer, the Alexandra Institute, Danish Fundamental Metrology and the Danish Institute of Fire and Security Technology — as an approved technological-service network. Under the Ministry of Higher Education and Science's oversight, each institute enters multi-year performance contracts, worth roughly 300 million DKK per year across 49 agreed intervention areas in the 2021-2024 period, to develop and disseminate advanced technological knowledge to Danish businesses, acting as the bridge between university research and industrial practice.
In 2024 the network served 20,648 private Danish companies, 89 percent of them small and medium-sized enterprises, on a combined turnover exceeding 4.3 billion DKK — evidence of the network's reach into the SME segment specifically, rather than mainly serving large incumbents. The institutes also proved resilient through the pandemic-era shock, with total revenue falling 5 percent from 2019 to 2020 before rebounding 3.4 percent the following year.
A cross-cutting evaluation of the GTS institutes was carried out in 2023 by the Danish Centre for Research Analysis (CFA) at Aarhus University, an independent academic evaluator. Its focus, however, was on how institutes managed and reported against the Ministry's performance-contract funds — including a new requirement for each of the 49 intervention areas to have its own follow-up group — rather than a counterfactual measurement of the productivity or innovation gains experienced by client firms.

Read the full analysis: https://ufsn.dk/english/research-and-innovation/research-and-test-facilities/infrastructure-between-research-and-industry-gts/description-of-the-gts-net/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful