evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Imtiaz-Croissance — Morocco's Growth-Contract Investment Grants for High-Potential SMEs

Morocco · Rabat · See the Morocco profile · See the Rabat profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 74% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Morocco's Imtiaz programme grants qualifying SMEs an investment premium of 20% of project cost (capped at 5M MAD) tied to a growth contract; by 2019 it had backed 1,293 firms, though the Cour des Comptes found ANPME's monitoring inadequate.

1,293
Enterprises supported (2014–September 2019)
1,729
Investment projects (2014–September 2019)
~8.3 billion MAD
Total investment value (2014–September 2019)
39,392 of 78,508
Committed jobs, direct of total (2014–September 2019)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Maroc PME (Agence Nationale pour la Promotion de la Petite et Moyenne Entreprise)
Period
2011–present
Keywords
SME finance, industrial policy, investment grants

Context

Imtiaz, run by Maroc PME (formerly ANPME) since around 2010-2011, grants qualifying high-potential SMEs an investment premium worth 20% of their project cost, capped at 5 million Moroccan dirhams, in return for signing a 'Growth Contract' committing the firm to job-creation and value-added targets.

Results

Between 2014 and September 2019, Maroc PME supported 1,293 enterprises through 1,729 investment projects worth approximately 8.3 billion MAD, with commitments to create 78,508 jobs; Morocco's Cour des Comptes found the joint monitoring committee met only once and no reliable national SME database existed to verify outcomes independently.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Maroc PME selection committee and account managers

Conditions for success

  • tying the investment premium to a signed 'Growth Contract' with job-creation and value-added targets
  • selecting candidates through a public–private selection committee

Common failure modes

  • the Cour des Comptes found the joint monitoring committee met only once, no dedicated complaints-tracking unit existed, and no reliable national SME database was built to verify outcomes independently
  • job and investment totals are programme commitments and self-reported figures, not independently audited results

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful