evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

IVN's Tiny Forest Programme — Nationwide Miyawaki Micro-Forests with Citizen-Science Biodiversity Monitoring (Netherlands)

Netherlands · Zaandam · See the Netherlands profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 41% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2015 Dutch NGO IVN has planted 200+ tennis-court-sized 'Tiny Forests' nationwide. Wageningen University's citizen-science monitoring recorded 595-636 species across the network and ~250 kg CO2/year sequestered per mature 200 m² plot.

595-636
Species recorded across the monitored network
148,255
Citizen-science observations logged (2018-2021)
~250 kg CO2/year
CO2 sequestered per mature 200m² forest
200+
Tiny Forests on public land
IVN's Tiny Forest Programme — Nationwide Miyawaki Micro-Forests with Citizen-Science Biodiversity Monitoring (Netherlands)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
IVN Natuureducatie, in partnership with Wageningen Environmental Research (WENR)
Period
2015-present
Region (NUTS)
NL32
Keywords
urban greening, biodiversity monitoring, environmental education, nature-based solutions

Context

The first Tiny Forest was planted in Zaandam in 2015, adapting botanist Akira Miyawaki's dense, fast-growing native afforestation method to small urban plots roughly the size of a tennis court (200-250 m², 3 saplings/m², 20-40 native species). The programme is run by IVN (Instituut voor Natuureducatie en Duurzaamheid), typically with a local school as adopter.

Objectives

IVN aimed to scale a network of urban micro-forests nationwide while using citizen-science monitoring to document their ecological impact.

Activities

By the mid-2020s IVN reported more than 200 Tiny Forests on public land and close to 100 more on private ground, involving roughly 20,000 schoolchildren, 1,500 teachers and 1,200 local residents. Wageningen Environmental Research (WENR) ran structured biodiversity monitoring across 11 Tiny Forests from 2018-2021.

Results

WENR logged 148,255 observations and documented 595 species; later network-wide reporting put the figure at 636 species, including 298 found beyond those originally planted. WENR also estimated carbon uptake at roughly 250 kg CO2/year for a mature 200 m² forest, though a young, vandalism-affected plot in Almere sequestered only about 4.3 kg in its first years.

Conclusions

Outcomes vary sharply with forest age and site condition. Some critics note plantings have drifted from strict Miyawaki-method species selection, and researchers have cautioned against using fast-growing non-native species or clearing existing meadows/community gardens to make way for new plots.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Public forests cost roughly €20,000-22,000 to install.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — First forest planted 2015; 200+ public and ~100 private forests by the mid-2020s; WENR biodiversity study ran 2018-2021.
Staffing & skills
IVN Natuureducatie (programme coordination), Wageningen Environmental Research (WENR, biodiversity/carbon monitoring), Local schools (adopters, ~20,000 schoolchildren, ~1,500 teachers), ~1,200 local resident volunteers

Conditions for success

  • A local institutional adopter (usually a school) to plant, maintain and monitor each forest
  • A structured citizen-science monitoring protocol (WENR) to generate credible biodiversity data
  • Dense native-species Miyawaki planting (20-40 species, 3 saplings/m²) on small urban plots

Common failure modes

  • Some plantings have drifted from strict Miyawaki-method species selection
  • Practitioners and researchers have cautioned against fast-growing non-native species or clearing existing meadows/community gardens for new plots
  • Outcomes vary sharply with forest age/condition (a young, vandalism-affected plot sequestered ~4.3kg CO2 vs ~250kg for a mature plot)

Where it fits

Governance type
NGO-run national programme with school/community adopters
Scale
urban plot-level (200-250 m² each), 200+ sites nationally
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful