evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Korea's Smart Factory Programme — Subsidised Automation Adoption for Manufacturing SMEs

South Korea · Sejong · See the South Korea profile · See the Sejong profile

Top 42% 71/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2014 South Korea's Ministry of SMEs and Startups has subsidised smart-factory conversions for SMEs. Government survey data and an independent matched-sample study both report double-digit productivity gains, though reviews find effects concentrate at the process level.

Korea's Smart Factory Programme — Subsidised Automation Adoption for Manufacturing SMEs

Details

Promoter
Ministry of SMEs and Startups (Korea Smart Manufacturing Office / KOSMO)
Period
2014-present
Keywords
manufacturing, industry 4.0, automation, smart factory, SME productivity

Description

Launched in 2014 by South Korea's Ministry of SMEs and Startups and administered through the Korea Smart Manufacturing Office (KOSMO), the Smart Factory programme co-funds the adoption of IoT, data-collection, automation and AI tools by manufacturing SMEs, tiered from basic digitisation to advanced smart-factory conversion. Support has reached more than 24,000 manufacturing SMEs across over 32,000 projects.
Government survey data (Ministry of SMEs and Startups, via a Korea Federation of SMEs poll of firms that completed conversion) reports average production-cost cuts of 15.5%, productivity gains of 28.5%, quality improvements of 42.5%, about 2.6 additional employees per firm and a 6.2% reduction in industrial accidents; 15.1% of surveyed firms reported increased employment after conversion. An independent, peer-reviewed evaluation using propensity-score matching on more than 7,000 SMEs that completed conversion in 2019-2020 corroborates the direction and scale of these effects — +29% productivity, +42.1% quality, -35.2% unit costs, +11.3% sales and +2.1 full-time-equivalent jobs per firm one year after implementation — by comparing treated firms against matched non-participants rather than relying on self-reported before/after figures alone.
Caveats: other academic reviews of the same policy family caution that measured gains cluster at the process level (defect rates, lead times, unit costs) and that effects on broader firm profitability are harder to detect within short observation windows of roughly two years. Reshoring cases such as Aju Steel Co., which relocated coated-steel production from the Philippines back to Gimcheon after digitalising its lines, illustrate the qualitative story behind the statistics but are anecdotal rather than representative.

Read the full analysis: https://www.kedglobal.com/korean-smes/newsView/ked202203030010

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful