evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Lesotho Highlands Water Project — Cross-Border Royalty Payments for Water

Lesotho · Maseru · See the Lesotho profile · See the Maseru profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 100% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Under a 1986 treaty, South Africa pays Lesotho roughly R4bn (US$240m) a year — about 15% of Lesotho's budget — for c.800 million m3 of water transferred annually to the Vaal system, while affected highland communities report inadequate compensation and environmental degradation.

~R4bn (~US$240m)
Annual royalty payment to Lesotho (2025)
R780m
Royalty payment (2015) (2015)
~15%
Share of Lesotho's government budget (2025)
~800 million m³
Water transferred annually (current)
~60%
Share of Johannesburg's water needs supplied (current)
72 communities (18 settlements)
Communities affected by 2025 compensation complaint (2025)
Lesotho Highlands Water Project — Cross-Border Royalty Payments for Water Lesotho Highlands Water Project — Cross-Border Royalty Payments for Water

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) / Government of the Kingdom of Lesotho
Period
1986-present
Keywords
transboundary water transfer, bulk water royalties, hydropower, treaty-based payments

Context

Under the 1986 Treaty on the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, the Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) and South Africa's Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority jointly operate a system of dams and more than 120km of 5-metre-diameter tunnels that transfer highland river water from Lesotho into South Africa's Vaal River system. The Katse and Mohale dams are complete and operating; the Polihali dam (Phase II) is under construction, targeted for completion around 2030.

Results

In exchange for roughly 800 million cubic metres of water transferred a year — supplying about 60% of the water needs of Johannesburg's roughly 5.5 million residents — South Africa pays Lesotho a royalty now approaching R4 billion (around US$240 million) a year, equivalent to roughly 15% of Lesotho's government budget, up from R780 million (about 5% of state income outside taxes) in 2015. The scheme's benefits to Lesotho's national treasury are well documented, but benefits to the highland communities whose catchments generate the water are contested: communities displaced during the first two construction phases report inadequate compensation and resettlement to areas lacking electricity, water and sanitation. In November 2025, representatives of 72 communities across 18 settlements filed a complaint with the African Development Bank alleging stream pollution, farmland loss, forest degradation and reduced pasture access without adequate consultation or benefit-sharing.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA), South Africa's Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority

Conditions for success

  • functioning bi-national treaty governance between Lesotho and South Africa
  • adequate compensation, consultation and benefit-sharing with highland communities

Common failure modes

  • communities displaced by construction resettled without electricity, water or sanitation
  • compensation described by affected communities as inadequate and delayed
  • loss of communal grazing land and stream pollution in catchment communities

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful