evidoria

What works in Maseru

All catalogues · Lesotho profile

5
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
20%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Scalability & sustainability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Governance, certification & transferability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Sustainability -30 pts 50 here · 80 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -51 pts 0 here · 51 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -53 pts 0 here · 53 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Innovation level
60 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 66
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 60
Sustainability
50 · 80
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 51
Efficiency
0 · 52
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 53

Coloured bar: Maseru. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Basic Education Strengthening Project (BESP) – Tech-Enabled Teaching & Youth Clubs · 92

Reserved Women-Only Electoral Divisions — Lesotho's 2005 Local Government Gender Quota · 74

AI for Citizens — UNDP and Intel's Digital Ambassador Network Bringing AI Literacy to Rural Lesotho · 53

Samsung Innovation Campus — AI, Coding & IoT Training at Lerotholi Polytechnic, Lesotho · 40

Lesotho Highlands Water Project — Cross-Border Royalty Payments for Water · 7

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more