evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life

Peru · Lima · See the Peru profile · See the Lima profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 12% 86/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2010, Lima Cómo Vamos has surveyed ~2,000 residents of Metropolitan Lima annually on urban quality of life. A 2022 peer-reviewed study of its 2010–2019 data found satisfaction fell across most dimensions, with steeper declines for lower-income residents.

6.5 percentage points
Decline in air-quality satisfaction (2010-2019) (2010-2019)
87 %
Residents dissatisfied with citizen security (15th edition)
4.1 %
Residents satisfied with citizen security (15th edition)
2000 residents (approx.)
Annual survey sample size
Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Lima Cómo Vamos (Citizen Observatory) — Asociación UNACEM, Grupo RPP and Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, with the PUCP Institute of Public Opinion
Period
2010–present
Keywords
civic data, urban planning, citizen perception surveys, public policy

Context

Lima Cómo Vamos is a citizen data observatory founded in 2010 by Asociación UNACEM, Grupo RPP and the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP), with annual fieldwork run by PUCP's Institute of Public Opinion. It surveys a representative sample of roughly 2,000 residents of Metropolitan Lima and Callao each year.

Objectives

The observatory tracks residents' satisfaction with dimensions of urban life -- pollution, transport, sanitation, public space, safety and citizen culture among them -- publishing the results as an open Urban Perception Report.

Activities

Now in its 15th edition, the report is supplemented by thematic studies such as a January 2026 diagnosis of mototaxi mobility. Lima Cómo Vamos is one of dozens of independently-run 'Cómo Vamos' citizen observatories operating across Latin American cities under a shared methodology, and is a member of the UN-Habitat-linked World Urban Campaign, with funders and partners spanning private companies (UNACEM, RPP, Uber, Lima Expresa) and academia (PUCP).

Results

A peer-reviewed 2022 study, part of a Wellcome Trust-supported research project, analysed the 2010-2019 series and found satisfaction had declined across nearly all measured dimensions -- air-quality satisfaction fell 6.5 percentage points and green-space satisfaction roughly halved -- with residents in lower socioeconomic brackets (D/E) showing steeper declines and consistently worse ratings than higher-income residents (A/B). The most recent (15th) edition reported that 87% of respondents were dissatisfied with citizen security, against 4.1% satisfied.

Conclusions

The 2010-2019 analysis found the gap between socioeconomic groups widened over the decade, indicating that citywide quality-of-life gains, where they occurred, were not shared evenly.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Small annual survey operation (~2,000 respondents) run by an academic institute with private-sector funding; no infrastructure or large capital costs described in the source -- estimated low cost band.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Continuously operating since 2010 through at least its 15th edition (2026), a 15-year-plus open-ended programme -- long timeline band.
Staffing & skills
PUCP's Institute of Public Opinion (annual fieldwork), Asociación UNACEM and Grupo RPP (founding organisers/funders)

Conditions for success

  • Diversified funding base across private companies and academia
  • Consistent annual methodology sustained for 15 editions
  • Shared regional 'Cómo Vamos' methodology enabling comparability across Latin American cities

Common failure modes

  • Remains a periodic annual survey rather than a continuously scaled monitoring service

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful