evidoria

What works in Lima

All catalogues · Peru profile

38
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
16%
strong evidence, of 32 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Lima

Lima Cómo Vamos is a citizen data observatory that has surveyed roughly 2,000 residents of Metropolitan Lima annually since 2010 to track urban quality of life. Between 2010 and 2019, satisfaction declined across nearly all measured dimensions—air-quality satisfaction fell 6.5 percentage points and green-space satisfaction roughly halved—with residents in lower socioeconomic brackets experiencing steeper declines than higher-income residents. The most recent survey (15th edition) found 87% of respondents dissatisfied with citizen security, compared to only 4.1% satisfied. The evidence does not quantify causal drivers of these declines or assess interventions to reverse them.

Drawn from: Peru's Electoral Gender Parity and Alternation Reform (Ley N° 31030, 2020) · Internet para Todos (IpT) – Rural 4G Wholesale Network · Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life · CITE Network — Peru's Technology-Extension Centres for SMEs · Peru's Geobosques Early-Warning System - MINAM's Satellite Deforestation Alerts, Tested by a Randomized Trial · Laboratoria — Coding Bootcamp Closing the Tech Gender Gap in Latin America · Startup Perú — National Seed-Capital Fund for Innovative Entrepreneurs · Centros de Emergencia Mujer — Peru's National One-Stop Network for Gender-Based Violence Survivors

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +41 pts 89 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +17 pts 55 here · 37 average

Inclusiveness / equity +14 pts 57 here · 43 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +14 pts 92 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -9 pts 80 here · 89 average

Impact on gender equality -11 pts 60 here · 71 average

Efficiency -13 pts 20 here · 33 average

Curator validation -13 pts 60 here · 73 average

Evaluation evidence -24 pts 25 here · 49 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
89 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
55 · 37
Inclusiveness / equity
57 · 43
Sustainability (ongoing)
92 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
81 · 74
Scalability & sustainability
69 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured public value
64 · 57
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Transferability / replicability
65 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
52 · 47
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Evaluated outcomes
80 · 79
Documented learning
75 · 74
Equity & inclusion
48 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Innovation level
55 · 62
Effectiveness
60 · 68
Achievement / evidence
80 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
80 · 89
Impact on gender equality
60 · 71
Efficiency
20 · 33
Curator validation
60 · 73
Evaluation evidence
25 · 49
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76

Coloured bar: Lima. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Peru's Electoral Gender Parity and Alternation Reform (Ley N° 31030, 2020) · 96

Internet para Todos (IpT) – Rural 4G Wholesale Network · 96

Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life · 86

CITE Network — Peru's Technology-Extension Centres for SMEs · 81

Peru's Geobosques Early-Warning System - MINAM's Satellite Deforestation Alerts, Tested by a Randomized Trial · 80

Laboratoria — Coding Bootcamp Closing the Tech Gender Gap in Latin America · 78

Startup Perú — National Seed-Capital Fund for Innovative Entrepreneurs · 76

Centros de Emergencia Mujer — Peru's National One-Stop Network for Gender-Based Violence Survivors · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more