evidoria

What works in Lima

All catalogues · Peru profile

21
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
16%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Lima

Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life shows that residents of Metropolitan Lima report declining satisfaction across most dimensions of urban quality of life. Between 2010 and 2019, air-quality satisfaction fell by 6.5 percentage points and green-space satisfaction roughly halved, with lower-income residents experiencing steeper declines than higher-income residents. In the most recent survey, 87% of respondents expressed dissatisfaction with citizen security. The evidence demonstrates trends in resident perceptions but does not quantify underlying conditions or establish causal drivers of these declines.

Drawn from: Peru's Electoral Gender Parity and Alternation Reform (Ley N° 31030, 2020) · Internet para Todos (IpT) – Rural 4G Wholesale Network · Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life · CITE Network — Peru's Technology-Extension Centres for SMEs · Laboratoria — Coding Bootcamp Closing the Tech Gender Gap in Latin America · Startup Perú — National Seed-Capital Fund for Innovative Entrepreneurs · Peru's IRI — an AI Risk Index Scoring 190,000+ Public Investment Projects for Corruption and Mismanagement Signals · Teaching Entrepreneurship — FINCA Peru's Village-Bank Business Training Trial

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +38 pts 89 here · 51 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +12 pts 92 here · 80 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -40 pts 50 here · 90 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
89 · 51
Documented learning
100 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Sustainability (ongoing)
92 · 80
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
71 · 66
Governance, certification & transferability
71 · 66
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 53
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
80 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
40 · 39
Innovation level
63 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Efficiency
50 · 52
Evidence of learning impact
27 · 30
Transparency, ethics & data protection
47 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
47 · 54
Equity & inclusion
47 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 90

Coloured bar: Lima. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Peru's Electoral Gender Parity and Alternation Reform (Ley N° 31030, 2020) · 96

Internet para Todos (IpT) – Rural 4G Wholesale Network · 96

Lima Cómo Vamos — a Long-Running Citizen Data Observatory for Urban Quality of Life · 86

CITE Network — Peru's Technology-Extension Centres for SMEs · 81

Laboratoria — Coding Bootcamp Closing the Tech Gender Gap in Latin America · 78

Startup Perú — National Seed-Capital Fund for Innovative Entrepreneurs · 76

Presupuesto Participativo — Peru's National Participatory Budgeting Law · 67

Peru's IRI — an AI Risk Index Scoring 190,000+ Public Investment Projects for Corruption and Mismanagement Signals · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more