evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Liverpool City Council's 'Digital Layer' — a £2.7m AI and Automation Contract Projected to Save £1.8m a Year

United Kingdom · Liverpool · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Liverpool profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 89% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Liverpool City Council signed a five-year, £2.7m contract with Jadu to build a low-code 'Digital Layer' combining case management, Microsoft Power Platform and generative AI, projected to cut costs by about £1.8m a year by reducing residents' need to chase service updates.

2.7 GBP million
Contract value (5 years)
1.8 GBP million/year
Projected annual savings
Liverpool City Council's 'Digital Layer' — a £2.7m AI and Automation Contract Projected to Save £1.8m a Year

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Liverpool City Council, with Jadu
Period
2024–2029 (five-year contract)
Keywords
case management, local government, citizen services, automation

Context

Liverpool City Council (serving almost 500,000 residents) faced fragmented customer enquiries across disconnected systems. In early 2025 the council selected Jadu for a low-code 'Digital Layer' case-management platform.

Activities

The five-year, GBP2.7m contract (in force October 2024) integrates with Brightly Confirm (highways) and NEC (revenues and benefits), using Microsoft Power Platform and generative AI to automate enquiry handling.

Results

The council and trade press project around GBP1.8m/year in recurring savings from reduced repeat contacts and manual case handling; no independent evaluation of realised savings has yet been published.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Liverpool City Council customer experience team, Jadu implementation team

Conditions for success

  • integration across existing highways and revenues/benefits systems
  • measured post-deployment tracking of realised savings

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful