evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

LKPP's e-Audit — Indonesia's Algorithm-Based Anomaly Detection for the National e-Katalog Procurement System

Indonesia · Jakarta · See the Indonesia profile · See the Jakarta profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 62% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Indonesia's procurement agency LKPP, anti-corruption body KPK and auditor BPKP built an algorithm-based e-Audit dashboard flagging four fraud patterns in the mandatory e-Katalog marketplace, as e-purchasing volume grew from Rp83.6 trillion in 2022 to Rp261.2 trillion in 2024.

83.6 IDR trillion
e-Katalog transaction volume, 2022
261.2 IDR trillion
e-Katalog transaction volume, 2024
~90%
Share of KPK prosecutions involving procurement

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
LKPP (National Public Procurement Agency), with BPKP and KPK, and technology partner PT Telkom Indonesia
Period
2024–2025
Keywords
public procurement, anti-corruption, e-government, digital audit

Context

Indonesia's LKPP, anti-corruption commission KPK and audit body BPKP built an algorithm-based 'e-Audit' feature for the mandatory e-Katalog marketplace, launched 6 March 2024 and relaunched with PT Telkom Indonesia on 8 December 2025.

Activities

The system flags 4 recurring anomaly patterns to internal government auditors: repeated purchases from the same vendor, price spikes/drops around a purchase, unusually fast first transactions on new listings, and sub-60-minute transactions.

Results

KPK states close to 90% of the corruption cases it prosecutes involve procurement; e-Katalog transaction volume grew from Rp83.6 trillion (2022) to Rp261.2 trillion (2024).

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
LKPP, BPKP, KPK, PT Telkom Indonesia (technology partner)

Conditions for success

  • tripartite LKPP-BPKP-KPK oversight structure
  • internal government auditors (APIP) acting on flagged anomalies

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful