Consult — UK Government's AI Tool for Analysing Public Consultation Responses
United Kingdom
Consult, built by the UK's i.AI unit with the Alan Turing Institute, uses generative AI to analyse tens of thousands …
France · Paris · See the France profile · See the Paris profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 35% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
LLaMandement is DGFiP's fine-tuned Llama 2 model that classifies and summarises amendments to France's annual Finance Bill. Officials report it cuts amendment-processing time from 6-10 hours to 15 minutes; senators have raised workload and digital-sovereignty caveats.
Each autumn, France's Parliament tables thousands of amendments to the annual Finance Bill, which Direction Générale des Finances Publiques (DGFiP) officials must read, route to the right ministerial expert team, and summarise for negotiators — an exercise nicknamed 'la nuit des amendements' (the night of the amendments).
To automate the classification/routing and drafting of neutral summaries of parliamentary budget amendments.
In 2023-24, DGFiP's data science team, working with DINUM and DILA, built LLaMandement by adapting Meta's open-source Llama 2 model through low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on more than 15,000 real amendment-and-summary pairs drawn from SIGNALE, the interministerial platform for managing legislative amendments. The method was published in a peer-reviewable arXiv paper (January 2024) and a version of the model and part of the training data were released openly on Hugging Face ('AgentPublic/LlaMAndement-7b').
DGFiP and Senate officials have cited a fall in per-amendment processing time from 6-10 hours of manual work to around 15 minutes. The authors reported summarisation quality 'close to that of human writers' on the specialised task, though without publishing a precise quantitative accuracy figure against a human baseline.
When the Senate considered adopting a version of the tool for its own 2024 budget session, budget rapporteur Jean-François Husson cautioned it 'will not significantly lighten' senators' real workload since freed-up time would likely go toward deeper amendment scrutiny; other senators raised digital-sovereignty concerns about building sensitive legislative infrastructure on an American foundation model. As of the cited reporting, a dedicated Senate deployment had not been finally decided, and use of the tool remains centred on DGFiP's own internal process.
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
National / regional programmes Digital Europe Programme
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United Kingdom
Consult, built by the UK's i.AI unit with the Alan Turing Institute, uses generative AI to analyse tens of thousands …
Netherlands
The Netherlands piloted its Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment on 15 government algorithms in 2023-24, testing whether agencies can …
Australia
Canberra required 94 federal agencies to publish AI-use transparency statements by 28 Feb 2025. The Digital Transformation Agency says all …
Australia
Since 15 Dec 2025, Australia's DTA requires every non-corporate Commonwealth agency to screen new AI use cases via a 12-section …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.