evidoria

What works in Paris

All catalogues · France profile

64
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 57 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Paris

VIGINUM's D3lta detected 43 separate information-manipulation operations targeting Paris during the 2024 Olympics, demonstrating France's capacity to identify and expose coordinated disinformation at scale. The evidence is limited to disinformation campaigns around a specific event and does not address other aspects of Paris or broader city outcomes.

Drawn from: Grenelle contre les violences conjugales (France, 2019) · France's Professional Equality Index (Index d'égalité professionnelle) — Mandatory Gender Pay Score · DINUM's Disabled-User Testing Panel & Ara Audit Tool — Institutionalising Accessibility in France's State Digital Services · VIGINUM's D3lta — France's Open-Source AI Tool for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation · UNESCO AI competency frameworks for students and teachers · CARER+ — Digital Competences for Home Care Workers and Informal Carers · Connexions Solidaires — Emmaüs Connect's Device, Connectivity & Skills Network · Conseillers Numériques France Services

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +16 pts 62 here · 47 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +11 pts 85 here · 74 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +9 pts 62 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +8 pts 46 here · 37 average

Weaknesses

Documented learning -10 pts 64 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -10 pts 57 here · 68 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -20 pts 29 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
62 · 47
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
85 · 74
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
46 · 37
Sustainability
85 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
86 · 79
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Curator validation
78 · 73
Scalability
67 · 62
Innovation level
66 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
46 · 43
Demonstrated reach
79 · 76
Transferability / replicability
61 · 60
Impact on gender equality
71 · 71
Evidence of learning impact
25 · 26
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
88 · 89
Achievement / evidence
86 · 88
Evidence of impact / measured results
55 · 57
Efficiency
29 · 33
Equity & inclusion
46 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
58 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Documented learning
64 · 74
Effectiveness
57 · 68
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Evaluation evidence
29 · 49

Coloured bar: Paris. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Grenelle contre les violences conjugales (France, 2019) · 96

France's Professional Equality Index (Index d'égalité professionnelle) — Mandatory Gender Pay Score · 96

DINUM's Disabled-User Testing Panel & Ara Audit Tool — Institutionalising Accessibility in France's State Digital Services · 96

VIGINUM's D3lta — France's Open-Source AI Tool for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation · 93

UNESCO AI competency frameworks for students and teachers · 93

CARER+ — Digital Competences for Home Care Workers and Informal Carers · 92

Connexions Solidaires — Emmaüs Connect's Device, Connectivity & Skills Network · 92

Conseillers Numériques France Services · 92

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more