evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Local Law 35 — New York City's Annual Public Inventory of Municipal Algorithmic Tools

United States of America · New York City · See the United States of America profile

Under NYC's Local Law 35 (2022), every city agency must publicly report each algorithmic tool it used yearly. The 2023 report counted 46 tools across 14 agencies - six times the 8 recorded a decade earlier - after inconsistent reporting forced clearer definitions.

Local Law 35 — New York City's Annual Public Inventory of Municipal Algorithmic Tools

Details

Promoter
NYC Office of Technology and Innovation (OTI)
Period
2022–present
Keywords
AI transparency, municipal government, digital government, public administration

Description

Local Law 35 of 2022 requires every New York City agency to report annually to the Mayor's Office on each algorithmic tool — defined as any machine-learning, AI or predictive-analytics process used to make or assist decisions materially affecting the public's rights, benefits or safety — that it used during the prior year, including the tool's purpose, the data it draws on and any vendor's role. The Office of Technology and Innovation (OTI) compiles agency submissions into a public annual report, released as PDF, JSON, XML and CSV.

The 2023 compliance report counted 46 algorithmic tools in use across 14 city agencies, up roughly sixfold from just 8 tools identified a decade earlier — a jump that reflects both real growth in AI adoption and improved compliance awareness. Around 35% of the listed tools process personally identifying information such as names, location or health data.

OTI itself acknowledged that early reports suffered from inconsistent terminology across agencies and issued clearer shared definitions to improve future compliance — an honest admission that the inventory's completeness depends on how consistently individual agencies interpret the law's scope. The report catalogues tools in use; it does not itself evaluate whether those tools work well or are used fairly.

Read the full analysis: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/algorithmic-tools-compliance-report

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful