evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Maguire v SOCOG — the 2000 Ruling That Made an Inaccessible Website Unlawful Discrimination in Australia

Australia · Sydney · See the Australia profile · See the Sydney profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 39% 76/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In 2000 Australia's Human Rights Commission ruled the Sydney Olympics website unlawfully discriminated against blind complainant Bruce Maguire, one of the world's first web-accessibility legal rulings - though SOCOG only partially complied.

AUD 20,000
Damages awarded (2000)

Details

Promoter
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (now Australian Human Rights Commission)
Period
1999–2000 complaint and ruling; ongoing legal precedent
Keywords
disability rights, legal enforcement, web accessibility, human rights

Context

On 7 June 1999, Bruce Maguire, a blind Sydney resident, filed a complaint alleging the Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (SOCOG) had discriminated against him under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 by failing to provide an accessible website, Braille ticketing and a Braille souvenir programme.

Results

On 24 August 2000, HREOC found a website constitutes a 'service' under the Act and that SOCOG had unlawfully discriminated; SOCOG was ordered to add alt text and make key pages accessible, and, after only partial compliance, Maguire was awarded AUD 20,000 in damages.

Conclusions

One of the first rulings anywhere to treat an inaccessible website as unlawful disability discrimination, underpinning Australia's current WCAG 2.1 AA requirement for federal digital services — but SOCOG's partial compliance even after losing shows a favourable judgment does not by itself guarantee remediation.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Minimal direct remediation cost (alt text, accessible page fixes) but establishes broader legal-compliance costs across future digital services.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Complaint filed June 1999; ruling issued 24 August 2000, before the Sydney Olympics began.
Staffing & skills
SOCOG web development team (remediation)

Conditions for success

  • legal ruling establishing a website as a 'service' under disability-discrimination law, creating an enforceable obligation

Common failure modes

  • SOCOG only partially complied even after losing the case
  • Australia still lacks a published agency-by-agency compliance reporting framework a quarter-century later

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful