evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Israel's Standard IS 5568 — Binding Digital Accessibility Law with No-Fault Enforcement

Israel · Jerusalem · See the Israel profile · See the Jerusalem profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 86% 48/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Israel's binding IS 5568 standard requires nearly all public and private websites and apps to meet WCAG 2.0 AA, enforced via administrative fines and no-fault damages lawsuits — one of the world's most strictly enforced digital accessibility regimes.

1.5-1.6 million ~18-20% of population
People living with a disability in Israel
75,000 NIS + ~3,700 NIS/day
Administrative penalty for non-compliance
Israel's Standard IS 5568 — Binding Digital Accessibility Law with No-Fault Enforcement

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Israeli Ministry of Justice
Period
2013–present
Keywords
web accessibility, WCAG 2.0, disability rights, e-government, ICT regulation, legal enforcement

Context

Israel's digital accessibility regime is built on the 1998 Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities Law and its 2013 'Accessibility Adjustments to Services' Regulations, which first explicitly extended accessibility duties to websites, mobile applications, self-service kiosks and digital information. The technical benchmark, Israeli Standard IS 5568, aligns essentially one-to-one with W3C's WCAG 2.0 at conformance level AA.

Activities

After delays from an original 2015 target, the standard took full legal effect on 26 October 2017 for new sites and existing large-organisation sites; smaller businesses were given until October 2020, with the very smallest exempted entirely.

Results

The Commissioner for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities can issue a binding accessibility order against a non-compliant site owner, with penalties reported at roughly NIS 75,000 plus about NIS 3,700 per day of continued violation. Separately, the law allows private lawsuits for statutory damages (reported up to NIS 50,000) without the plaintiff needing to prove personal harm or even have a disability.

Conclusions

Access Israel, the country's first and largest disability-accessibility NGO, plays a central advisory and awareness role alongside the statutory regime. No independently audited, sector-wide compliance-rate study was found; enforcement relies mainly on private litigation, with no consolidated public count of accessibility orders or lawsuits.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Compliance cost borne by site owners; damages/penalties not systematically tallied.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Regulations from 2013; standard took full legal effect 26 October 2017; small-business deadline October 2020.
Staffing & skills
Commissioner for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Ministry of Justice), Access Israel NGO advisors and certified consultants

Conditions for success

  • a technical standard aligned one-to-one with an international benchmark (WCAG 2.0 AA)
  • dual enforcement track combining administrative orders and no-fault private litigation
  • a phased compliance timeline by organisation size

Common failure modes

  • no independently audited, sector-wide compliance-rate study exists
  • no consolidated public count of accessibility orders or lawsuits

Where it fits

Governance type
national law with dual administrative/civil enforcement
Scale
national
Income level
high income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful