evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot

Russia · Moscow · See the Russia profile

Since 2007, Russia's 'maternity capital' grant (now ~737,000 rubles) raised long-run fertility by ~0.15 children per woman, but peer-reviewed and feminist research find it reinforces women's caregiver role, not workplace equality.

Details

Promoter
Pension Fund of Russia (since 2023: Social Fund of Russia)
Period
2007-present (extended to 2030)
Keywords
family policy, cash transfers, pronatalism, gender-equality research

Description

Since 2007, the Russian government has paid a lump-sum 'maternity capital' benefit to mothers on the birth of a second child (extended to first children from 2020). The benefit has grown steadily - reaching roughly 737,204 rubles for a first child from February 2026 - and is administered by what was the Pension Fund of Russia and, since a 2023 merger, is the Social Fund of Russia. The programme has been extended through 2030.
The clearest independent evidence comes from Slonimczyk and Yurko (2014, Labour Economics), who estimate a structural dynamic model of fertility and employment on Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey data and find the policy raised long-run fertility by about 0.15 children per woman.
Feminist and demographic scholarship complicates the equality story. Rivkin-Fish's analysis in Slavic Review argues the policy channels support through mothers as primary caregivers and does not challenge the gendered division of paid and unpaid labour; other researchers link it to Russian women's persistent 'double burden' of full-time work plus disproportionate domestic and care responsibilities.
This entry is included as a well-evidenced cautionary case: a durable, rigorously studied, politically popular family policy that meaningfully changed fertility behaviour but - on the evidence available - did not advance gender equality in the workplace or the home, illustrating why family policy needs explicit gender-mainstreaming to count as a gender-equality practice.

Read the full analysis: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927537114000232

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 59

Macao's Women's Development Goals Plan

Macao

Macao SAR ran a seven-year, 21-department Women's Development Goals plan (2019-2025), reporting all 278 planned actions completed, and has launched …