What works in Russia
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Russia
Russia has undertaken several large-scale public initiatives with mixed evidence of impact. MosMedAI's AI-assisted radiology programme demonstrated that radiologists using AI assistance achieved 98.91% sensitivity in detecting intracranial haemorrhage across 3,409 brain CT studies, outperforming AI alone at 95.91%, and cut mammography interpretation time more than eight-fold across Moscow's 150 health facilities. The Moscow Region Peatland Rewetting Programme rewetted 73,050 hectares of fire-prone peatlands between 2010–2013, with satellite monitoring documenting reduced fire extent and model-based estimates of 36,000–320,000 tCO2eq annual emission reductions, though the authors caution these are not direct flux measurements. Azbuka Interneta's digital-literacy initiative trained over 500,000 pensioners across 76 regions since 2014, but annual enrolment declined to roughly 38,300 by 2024, representing less than 2% of Russia's approximately 33 million pensioner population.
Drawn from: MosMedAI — Moscow's City-Run Marketplace of AI "Second Readers" for Radiology, Tested Against Radiologists Alone · Moscow Region Peatland Rewetting Programme (Russia) · Azbuka Interneta: Digital Literacy for Russian Pensioners · Skolkovo Foundation — Russia's State-Anchored Innovation City · Innopolis — Russia's Purpose-Built IT City and the Gap Between Its Master Plan and Its Population · AI Challenge & the Russian AI Olympiad — Sber's School-to-University AI Talent Pipeline · Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot · Moscow's AI Facial-Recognition Camera Network — From Traffic Safety Pitch to Dissident and Draft-Evader Tracking
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +93 pts 100 here · 7 average
Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +50 pts 100 here · 50 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average
Weaknesses
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average
Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average
Transferability / replicability -20 pts 40 here · 60 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average
Inclusiveness / equity -25 pts 17 here · 42 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average
Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average
Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average
Curator validation -74 pts 0 here · 74 average
Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average
Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average
Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -91 pts 0 here · 91 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Russia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Moscow Region Peatland Rewetting Programme (Russia) · 80
Azbuka Interneta: Digital Literacy for Russian Pensioners · 68
Skolkovo Foundation — Russia's State-Anchored Innovation City · 48
Innopolis — Russia's Purpose-Built IT City and the Gap Between Its Master Plan and Its Population · 43
AI Challenge & the Russian AI Olympiad — Sber's School-to-University AI Talent Pipeline · 33
Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot · 26
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Russia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more