evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection

Japan · Tokyo · See the Japan profile · See the Tokyo profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 6% 87/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

MLIT runs a national catalog certifying AI and sensor-based bridge/tunnel inspection technologies against published performance criteria. Listings grew from 12 to 215 between 2019 and 2025, and use became mandatory on national-expressway inspections from fiscal year 2022.

12 technologies
Listed inspection technologies (Feb 2019) (Feb 2019)
215 technologies
Listed inspection technologies (Apr 2025) (Apr 2025)
91 technologies
Image-measurement technologies listed (Apr 2025)
76 technologies
Measurement/monitoring technologies listed (Apr 2025)
48 technologies
Non-destructive testing technologies listed (Apr 2025)
~40 %
Japan's bridges projected over 50 years old
MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT)
Period
2019-2026
Keywords
transport infrastructure, computer vision, regulatory certification, public works

Context

Japan faces a legal requirement to visually inspect every road bridge and tunnel every five years, with around 40% of the country's bridges projected to be over 50 years old, making manual close-range inspection increasingly costly and labour-intensive.

Objectives

To give local governments and engineers a vetted, comparable set of AI image-recognition, non-destructive testing and measurement/monitoring technologies as alternatives to manual inspection, with declared accuracy and applicable scope published for each.

Activities

MLIT launched the Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog in February 2019, listing AI systems (such as BMStar) that automatically detect and classify cracks, spalling, rebar exposure, water leakage and lime efflorescence from photographs or drone orthomosaic imagery, alongside non-destructive testing and monitoring technologies. New technologies are added through periodic public announcements, and developer-submitted performance sheets are reviewed against MLIT's standard test items.

Results

Listings grew from 12 bridge technologies in February 2019 to 215 by April 2025 (91 image-measurement, 76 measurement/monitoring, 48 non-destructive testing). Use of catalog-listed technologies became mandatory for specified national-expressway bridge and tunnel inspection items from FY2022, extended to pavement inspections from FY2023, turning a voluntary reference list into an enforced compliance mechanism.

Conclusions

The catalog scaled from a voluntary pilot list to a mandatory nationwide compliance mechanism, but individual technologies' accuracy claims are developer-submitted and ministry-reviewed rather than independently re-tested by a third party, so evidence strength varies by listed technology.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Catalog launched February 2019; listings grew from 12 to 215 by April 2025; mandatory use for national-expressway inspections from FY2022, extended to pavement inspections from FY2023.
Staffing & skills
Managed directly by MLIT (national ministry), Industry-academia-government working groups develop shared AI training data for crack detection, Technology performance sheets and periodic public announcements coordinated by MLIT and the Japan Bridge Engineering Center (JBEC)

Conditions for success

  • A pre-existing statutory five-year inspection mandate created guaranteed demand for vetted alternatives to manual close-range inspection
  • Converting a voluntary reference list into a mandatory requirement (FY2022 expressways, FY2023 pavements) drove real adoption
  • Standardised test items let many vendors submit comparable, published performance declarations

Common failure modes

  • Listed accuracy claims are developer-submitted and reviewed against MLIT's standard test items rather than independently re-tested, so evidence strength varies by individual listed technology

Where it fits

Governance type
national government ministry
Scale
national (all national-expressway bridge/tunnel inspections)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful