What works in Tokyo
All catalogues · Japan profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +31 pts 80 here · 49 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +31 pts 58 here · 28 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Governance, capability & sustainability +21 pts 85 here · 64 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Sustainability +17 pts 95 here · 78 average
Scalability beyond pilot +16 pts 78 here · 62 average
Curator validation +14 pts 88 here · 73 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +11 pts 17 here · 6 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 58 here · 48 average
Weaknesses
Innovation level -8 pts 54 here · 62 average
Equity & inclusion -11 pts 39 here · 50 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -11 pts 62 here · 74 average
Efficiency -20 pts 12 here · 33 average
Inclusiveness / equity -26 pts 17 here · 43 average
Impact on gender equality -33 pts 38 here · 71 average
Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average
Effectiveness -55 pts 12 here · 68 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Tokyo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · 96
Japan Post's Mimamori — Postal-Worker Home Visits for Elderly Living Alone · 92
Raku-Raku Phone/Smartphone — Fujitsu's User-Researched Handset Series for Older Adults · 92
NDLOCR — Japan's National Diet Library Doubles Historical-Text Recognition Accuracy With AI · 80
Japan Forest Environment Transfer Tax (Rinshin Kankyō Jōyo Zei) · 80
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more