What works in Tokyo
All catalogues · Japan profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Governance, capability & sustainability +24 pts 90 here · 66 average
Sustainability +17 pts 97 here · 80 average
Scalability beyond pilot +16 pts 82 here · 66 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +14 pts 22 here · 9 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +8 pts 58 here · 50 average
Weaknesses
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -8 pts 44 here · 53 average
Innovation level -10 pts 54 here · 64 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -23 pts 17 here · 39 average
Inclusiveness / equity -28 pts 13 here · 41 average
Efficiency -32 pts 20 here · 52 average
Achievement / evidence -33 pts 60 here · 93 average
Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average
Impact on gender equality -43 pts 40 here · 83 average
Effectiveness -61 pts 20 here · 81 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Tokyo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · 96
Japan Forest Environment Transfer Tax (Rinshin Kankyō Jōyo Zei) · 80
Japan's "Information I" — compulsory AI and data literacy for all high school students · 73
UTokyo Innovation Platform (IPC) — University of Tokyo's Venture-Capital Technology Transfer Arm · 71
SME Productivity Revolution Promotion Programme — Japan's IT and Productivity Subsidies · 71
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more