USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)
United States of America
USDA programme paying farmers to convert highly erodible cropland to permanent vegetative cover. 24.8 million acres (~10 Mha) enrolled; $1.8 …
Australia · Canberra · See the Australia profile · See the Canberra profile
Top 76% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Australia's statutory Basin Plan has recovered about 2,073 GL/yr of surface water for the environment (MDBA, June 2026), but only after the 2,750 GL target was cut to 2,075 GL; the 2025 evaluation finds local waterbird and wetland gains while native fish remain poor.
The Murray–Darling Basin Plan (2012, under the Water Act 2007) caps surface-water diversions and returns water to the environment through voluntary purchase of irrigators' entitlements and through funded efficiency projects. The Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) and the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder manage the recovered water.
Delivery: the MDBA reports contracted surface-water recovery towards "bridging the gap" of 2,073.1 GL/yr as at 30 June 2026, against a 2,075 GL/yr target (2,060.6 GL/yr was registered at 30 June 2025). The 2,075 GL figure is itself a reduction: the original recovery target was 2,750 GL/yr, changed by 2018 amendments conditional on measures to achieve outcomes with less water. Critics, for example in the Global Water Forum, argue that the cut reflected irrigator lobbying rather than best available science.
Outcomes: the MDBA's 2025 Basin Plan Evaluation finds evidence of improvement in many areas, including waterbird breeding in places such as Hattah and Narran Lakes, but says long-term outcomes are not yet evident across the whole Basin. The 2025 Sustainable Rivers Audit is more cautious: native fish expectedness was rated 'poor' in most valleys and recruitment 'poor' or 'very poor' across 19 valleys, and improved flow and connectivity have not yet significantly improved fish diversity.
Why it matters: a rare large-scale, legislated example of paying for water to stay in a river, with public progress reporting and independent evaluation. The lesson is that volumes recovered are an input metric; ecological recovery is slower, patchier and contested, and the target was weakened before delivery.
Read the full analysis: https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-use/water-environment/water-recovery/progress-water-recovery
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
USDA programme paying farmers to convert highly erodible cropland to permanent vegetative cover. 24.8 million acres (~10 Mha) enrolled; $1.8 …
Switzerland
Switzerland's statutory biodiversity payments compensate ~47,000 farms for maintaining over 184,000 ha of Biodiversity Promotion Areas — wildflower meadows, orchards, …
United States of America
Two century-old dams (32 m and 64 m) were removed in 2011–2014, reopening 70+ miles of habitat; salmon have recolonised …
France
About 50 farmers near one drinking-water intake are paid €80–125/ha when residual soil nitrogen at the start of winter stays …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.