evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Nepal Wireless Networking Project — Mahabir Pun's Himalayan Village-to-Village Internet

Nepal · Nangi · See the Nepal profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 1% 100/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Starting from a single WiFi link to Pokhara in 2002, teacher Mahabir Pun and volunteer engineers built the Nepal Wireless Networking Project, growing it to roughly 175 mountain villages with telemedicine, school and e-commerce links — work recognised by the 2007 Magsaysay Award.

~175 villages
Villages reached (2002-present)
~140 villages
Villages reached (c. 2012) (c. 2012)
15 districts
Districts covered (c. 2012)
22 villages
Villages reached (2005) (2005)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Nepal Wireless Networking Project
Period
2002–present
Keywords
telecommunications, rural connectivity, telemedicine, education, social enterprise

Context

In 2002, school teacher Mahabir Pun, with technical help from volunteer engineers he recruited online, rigged an indoor WiFi radio to a modified satellite-TV dish to bridge roughly 40km from his home village of Nangi, in Myagdi district, to internet access in Pokhara — the first hop of the Nepal Wireless Networking Project (NWNP).

Objectives

NWNP aimed to extend internet connectivity village-to-village across Nepal's mountain districts and to build local services on top of it — telemedicine, school networking, e-commerce and job/agricultural information — while training local technicians to reduce dependence on outside experts.

Activities

By 2005 the network reached 22 villages and carried telemedicine consultations from two rural clinics to a city hospital. By around 2012 it covered roughly 140 villages across 15 districts, later reported at over 175 villages, using long-distance WiFi links, mountain-ridgeline relay towers, and more recently satellite and fibre backhaul. NWNP seeded locally run telecentres operating as small businesses or community services.

Results

Pun received the 2007 Ramon Magsaysay Award for community leadership and was later inducted into the Internet Hall of Fame; the project has been the subject of independent case studies by the Association for Progressive Communications and academic reviews of its social and economic benefits.

Conclusions

Reported village and user counts vary across sources and years, and systematic, independently audited impact evaluation (for example of usage rates or income effects) is limited compared with the qualitative and case-study evidence available.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful