evidoria

What works in Nepal

All catalogues

33
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
4%
strong evidence, of 25 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Nepal

Nepal has implemented several large-scale development initiatives with documented social and technological impact. The Nepal Wireless Networking Project expanded internet access to roughly 175 mountain villages across 15 districts through long-distance WiFi and relay towers, enabling telemedicine and e-commerce services. OLE Nepal's digital learning programme deployed offline learning software to 180 schools reaching 40,000+ students in 16 districts, while the Abolition of Chhaupadi programme reduced the practice of menstrual exile huts from 19.4% to 5.5% among 45,990 women and girls in the Far- and Mid-Western districts. These practices demonstrate evidence-based approaches to rural connectivity, education access, and gender-based harm reduction, though the evidence presented is primarily descriptive or observational rather than from large-scale randomised trials.

Drawn from: Nepal Wireless Networking Project — Mahabir Pun's Himalayan Village-to-Village Internet · Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · Change Starts at Home — Couples' Curriculum and Community Diffusion Against Intimate Partner Violence, Nepal · Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · Dina — Nepal's First Text-to-Speech Voice Co-Designed With Blind and Low-Vision Youth · Nepal's Equal Inheritance Reform — From the 1995 Dhungana Ruling to the 2017 Civil Code · Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +34 pts 83 here · 49 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +29 pts 56 here · 27 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 89 here · 74 average

Equity & inclusion +12 pts 61 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Documented learning +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Impact on gender equality -12 pts 57 here · 70 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -15 pts 42 here · 57 average

Efficiency -17 pts 14 here · 32 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -19 pts 28 here · 47 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 28 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 38 average

Scalability & sustainability -22 pts 40 here · 62 average

Effectiveness -23 pts 43 here · 66 average

Demonstrated reach -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
83 · 49
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
56 · 27
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 74
Equity & inclusion
61 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Documented learning
83 · 74
Innovation level
67 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 48
Achievement / evidence
86 · 87
Curator validation
71 · 73
Transferability / replicability
56 · 60
Sustainability
73 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Impact on gender equality
57 · 70
Evidence of impact / measured public value
42 · 57
Efficiency
14 · 32
Transparency, ethics & data protection
28 · 47
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
28 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 38
Scalability & sustainability
40 · 62
Effectiveness
43 · 66
Demonstrated reach
33 · 76

Coloured bar: Nepal. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Nepal Wireless Networking Project — Mahabir Pun's Himalayan Village-to-Village Internet · 100

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · 100

OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · 96

Change Starts at Home — Couples' Curriculum and Community Diffusion Against Intimate Partner Violence, Nepal · 85

Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · 76

Dina — Nepal's First Text-to-Speech Voice Co-Designed With Blind and Low-Vision Youth · 76

Nepal's Equal Inheritance Reform — From the 1995 Dhungana Ruling to the 2017 Civil Code · 74

Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017) · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Nepal concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more