evidoria

What works in Nepal

All catalogues

23
evaluated practices
48/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 15 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Nepal

Drawn from: Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017) · CRMS — Nepal Customs' Machine-Learning Risk Targeting Now Covers 90% of Commercial Trade · SITA — Nepal's AI Platform Turning Months of Survey Analysis Into Seconds · Girls in ICT Day Nepal — Multi-City AI, Coding and Cybersecurity Push for Girls Aged 12–24 · Nepal's Community Forestry Programme — Devolved Forest Management by Community Forest User Groups

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +28 pts 58 here · 30 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 42 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 67 here · 45 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +15 pts 67 here · 52 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Sustainability -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence -16 pts 75 here · 91 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -17 pts 20 here · 37 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Efficiency -18 pts 25 here · 43 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -21 pts 38 here · 59 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -21 pts 27 here · 48 average

Scalability & sustainability -22 pts 42 here · 64 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality -30 pts 50 here · 80 average

Demonstrated reach -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
58 · 30
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Evaluation evidence
67 · 45
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 75
Innovation level
63 · 63
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Governance, certification & transferability
63 · 64
Transferability / replicability
55 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Documented learning
67 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
20 · 28
Sustainability
67 · 78
Achievement / evidence
75 · 91
Teacher capability & pedagogy
20 · 37
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Efficiency
25 · 43
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
38 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
27 · 48
Scalability & sustainability
42 · 64
Curator validation
50 · 74
Effectiveness
50 · 76
Impact on gender equality
50 · 80
Demonstrated reach
33 · 76

Coloured bar: Nepal. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · 100

OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · 96

Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · 76

Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017) · 74

CRMS — Nepal Customs' Machine-Learning Risk Targeting Now Covers 90% of Commercial Trade · 73

SITA — Nepal's AI Platform Turning Months of Survey Analysis Into Seconds · 53

Girls in ICT Day Nepal — Multi-City AI, Coding and Cybersecurity Push for Girls Aged 12–24 · 53

Nepal's Community Forestry Programme — Devolved Forest Management by Community Forest User Groups · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Nepal concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Step-by-Step — Refugee-Redesigned Digital Mental Health App, Trialled Nationally in Lebanon · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more