evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

North Macedonia's 40% Candidate Quota — A Legal Target Meeting a Declining Outcome (2015-2025)

North Macedonia · Skopje · See the North Macedonia profile

North Macedonia raised its candidate-list gender quota to 40% via Electoral Code amendments, but seat shares have since slipped from 42.5% (2024) to 39.2% (2025) — below the legal threshold — showing a legal quota alone does not guarantee proportional outcomes.

40 %
Candidate-list gender quota
42.5 %
Women's seat share in the Sobranie (2024)
39.2 (47 of 120 seats) %
Women's seat share in the Sobranie (2025)
45 %
Women candidates in municipal elections (2021)
36.2 %
Women elected as municipal councillors (2021)
North Macedonia's 40% Candidate Quota — A Legal Target Meeting a Declining Outcome (2015-2025)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia
Period
2015-2025
Keywords
politics, elections, legislation, gender quotas

Context

North Macedonia introduced a 30% gender quota for parliamentary and municipal candidate lists in 2006; Electoral Code amendments in the mid-2010s raised the threshold to 40% with placement rules and list-rejection sanctions for non-compliant lists.

Objectives

The quota and placement rules aim to increase women's presence on candidate lists and, ultimately, in elected office.

Activities

The State Election Commission rejects non-compliant candidate lists outright, and any vacated seat must go to the next candidate of the same gender on the list.

Results

Women's share of seats in the Sobranie has fluctuated around, and recently fallen below, the 40% legal threshold: 42.5% in 2024, dropping to 39.2% (47 of 120 seats) in 2025. At the municipal level, a 2021 IFES review found women made up 45% of candidates but only 36.2% of councillors actually elected.

Conclusions

A strict, sanction-backed candidate quota alone has not guaranteed proportional outcomes — parties retain room to place women in less winnable list positions, and gender equality was largely absent from recent campaign discourse.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful