evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

NYC's Generative-AI Moratorium — New York City Restricts Student AI Use From Pre-K Through Grade 8

United States of America · New York City · See the United States of America profile · See the New York City profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

New York City barred student-facing generative AI for ~600,000 students in grades 2-K–8, capped screen time, and limited high-school AI pilots to 50,000 students — the broadest U.S. school AI restriction, with carve-outs for assistive tech and multilingual learners.

~600,000
Students covered by the moratorium (Pre-K–Grade 8)
up to 50,000
High-school students in supervised AI pilots
NYC's Generative-AI Moratorium — New York City Restricts Student AI Use From Pre-K Through Grade 8

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
NYC Mayor's Office & New York City Department of Education
Period
Announced September 2026, effective 2026–2027 school year
Keywords
K-12 public education, public policy, child online safety

Context

In September 2026, New York City announced a one-year moratorium on student-facing generative AI for Pre-K through Grade 8 (about 600,000 students), with graduated screen-time caps and only five closely supervised high-school AI pilots.

Results

The policy is the broadest such restriction adopted by a US school system to date, with exceptions for assistive technology, multilingual learners and computer-science career-readiness programmes; as a just-announced policy, no outcome data exists yet.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
NYC Department of Education

Conditions for success

  • Explicit carve-outs for assistive technology, multilingual learners and CS career-readiness

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful