evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Indonesia's Joint 7-Minister Decree Sets Age-Based Rules for AI Use in Schools

Indonesia · Jakarta · See the Indonesia profile · See the Jakarta profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 56% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

On 12 March 2026, seven Indonesian cabinet ministers jointly signed a decree setting age-based limits on AI and digital-technology use in education, barring elementary and secondary students from instant-answer AI tools while easing restrictions at higher levels.

7 ministries
Ministries co-signing the decree (March 2026)
Indonesia's Joint 7-Minister Decree Sets Age-Based Rules for AI Use in Schools

Details

Promoter
Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Cultural Affairs (Indonesia), with six co-signing ministries
Period
March 2026
Keywords
AI governance, education policy, child online safety

Context

On 12 March 2026, seven Indonesian cabinet ministers — spanning home affairs, religious affairs, primary and secondary education, higher education, communications and digital affairs, population and family development, and women's empowerment and child protection — jointly signed a decree regulating the use of digital technology and AI in education, covering early childhood through higher education.

Objectives

Set a minimum age, permitted use types and a recommended duration of use for digital and AI tools at each education level, protecting younger students most, before AI tools become widespread in Indonesian classrooms.

Activities

Elementary and secondary students are explicitly barred from using 'instant-answer' AI tools that generate direct solutions to questions, while higher-education students are given more flexibility; the decree is a joint governance instrument spanning multiple ministries rather than a single ministry's guideline.

Conclusions

As a newly signed decree, there is not yet public evidence on enforcement mechanisms, school-level compliance, or measured effects on learning or academic integrity; its significance for now lies in being an unusually coordinated, explicit national governance framework rather than a demonstrated outcome.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No programme budget; a regulatory decree with no direct implementation spend described in available sources.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Signed 12 March 2026; enforcement and compliance status not yet reported.
Staffing & skills
Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Cultural Affairs (Indonesia), Six co-signing ministries (home affairs, religious affairs, primary/secondary education, higher education, communications and digital affairs, population and family development, women's empowerment and child protection)

Conditions for success

  • A joint governance instrument spanning child-protection, curriculum and digital-policy authorities together, rather than a single ministry acting alone
  • Age-tiered rules matched to developmental stage, tightest for younger students

Common failure modes

  • No public evidence yet on enforcement mechanisms or school-level compliance
  • No measured effects on learning or academic integrity reported

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful