Since 2011, fishers and the GoldenEye Foundation have co-managed a no-take marine sanctuary at Oracabessa Bay, Jamaica. NEPA-monitored herbivorous fish biomass rose from 1,192 g/100m² (2013) to 6,792 g/100m² (2020), alongside coral gardening and sea-turtle protection.
1,192 g/100m²
Herbivorous fish biomass (2013) (2013)
6,792 g/100m²
Herbivorous fish biomass (2020) (2020)
470%
Increase in fish biomass (2013–2020)
~2,500
Coral fragments grown in nurseries
220,000+
Sea-turtle hatchlings released since inception
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
Oracabessa Bay Marine Trust / GoldenEye Foundation
Jamaica's north-coast reefs suffered decades of overfishing and coral decline before a small group of Oracabessa fishers partnered with the GoldenEye Foundation in 2011 to declare a no-take fish sanctuary, now co-managed on a 50/50 fisher–trust board by the Oracabessa Bay Marine Trust.
Objectives
The sanctuary aims to rebuild fish biomass and reef health through no-take protection, coral gardening and sea-turtle conservation, while keeping local fishers as co-managers rather than excluding them.
Activities
Since 2013 the Trust has run a coral gardening programme growing coral fragments in underwater nurseries and out-planting them onto reef-enhancement structures, alongside a sea-turtle hatchery programme, and the co-management model has since been extended to four further north-coast sites with US State Department and GEF/UNDP support.
Results
Jamaica's National Environment and Planning Agency recorded herbivorous fish biomass rising from 1,192 g/100m² in 2013 to 6,792 g/100m² in 2020, roughly a 470% increase, alongside about 2,500 coral fragments grown and 500 out-planted, and more than 220,000 sea-turtle hatchlings released since inception.
Conclusions
Independent reporting cautions the recovery is not risk-free: pollution, microplastics, bleaching and algae overgrowth remain regional pressures, and tension persists between the no-take model and traditional parrotfish harvesting that fishers value even though parrotfish grazing supports reef health.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Supported by a US$17,000 US State Department grant (2019) plus GEF/UNDP funding; no aggregate programme budget given.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Operating continuously since 2011 (sanctuary) and 2013 (reef restoration).
Staffing & skills
Oracabessa fishers (co-managers), GoldenEye Foundation / Oracabessa Bay Marine Trust staff, Tufts University research collaborators
Conditions for success
50/50 fisher–trust co-management board giving fishers a governance stake rather than excluding them
Dedicated coral nursery and sea-turtle hatchery infrastructure
External grant funding (US State Department, GEF/UNDP) enabling replication to further sites
Common failure modes
Regional pressures from pollution, microplastics, bleaching and algae overgrowth
Tension between the no-take model and traditional parrotfish harvesting that fishers value for food
Physical strain on divers from repeated deep coral-planting dives
Where it fits
Governance type
community co-management (fisher–NGO trust)
Scale
local (single bay, replicated to 4 further sites)
Income level
upper-middle-income
Commonly funded by
Philanthropic / foundation fundingNational / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.