evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Yokohama Blue Carbon Project — Municipal Eelgrass Restoration Feeding Japan's National J Blue Credit Market

Japan · Yokohama · See the Japan profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Yokohama's municipally managed eelgrass beds became the first site in Japan's J Blue Credit market, turning coastal seagrass restoration into tradable carbon credits bought by firms including Sumitomo, Tokyo Gas and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines.

12.3 tCO2/year
Yokohama eelgrass sink capacity
7.8 ha (later >10 ha)
Yokohama eelgrass area
22.8 tCO2, 1 project
National J Blue Credit issuance, FY2020 (FY2020)
3733.1 tCO2, 21 projects
National J Blue Credit issuance, FY2022 (FY2022)
57 locations (45 cases)
J Blue Credit locations (December 2023)
73000 JPY/tonne (~USD 500)
Credit trading price
Yokohama Blue Carbon Project — Municipal Eelgrass Restoration Feeding Japan's National J Blue Credit Market

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
City of Yokohama / Yokohama Fishing Cooperative / Japan Blue Economy Association
Period
2011-present (J Blue Credit trading since 2021)
Keywords
marine conservation, carbon markets, fisheries, municipal government

Context

The Yokohama Blue Carbon Project, launched in 2011, was Japan's first initiative pursuing climate mitigation through marine ecosystem restoration, centred on eelgrass (Zostera) beds in the city's municipally managed Marine Park areas.

Objectives

Certify and monetise carbon sequestered by restored coastal eelgrass beds, first at municipal level and then through Japan's national J Blue Credit registry, feeding into the broader GX-ETS carbon market.

Activities

In September 2019 Yokohama certified carbon credits for its municipal eelgrass beds and that December became the first user of domestically generated blue carbon credits. JBE created the national J Blue Credit registry in FY2020 and issued its first credits (2 February 2021) for Yokohama's Bayside Marina seagrass/macroalgal beds.

Results

National J Blue Credit issuance rose from 22.8 t-CO2 across 1 project (FY2020) to 3,733.1 t-CO2 across 21 projects (FY2022), reaching 57 locations (45 cases) by December 2023. Yokohama's own eelgrass area was recorded at 7.8 hectares (sink capacity 12.3 t-CO2/year), later expanding beyond 10 hectares. Credits have traded at roughly JPY 73,000 (~USD 500)/tonne, about ten times conventional voluntary carbon prices, bought by Sumitomo, Tokyo Gas and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, and were linked into Japan's national GX-ETS market from 2024.

Conclusions

Independent commentary cited in the source notes real limitations: seagrass carbon uptake is hard to measure consistently across seasons and sites, credit permanence is threatened by 'isoyake' (marine-heat-driven seaweed die-off), and verification costs weigh heavily on small fishing cooperatives.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Municipal seagrass-bed management plus JBE registry verification costs, offset by credit sales at ~JPY 73,000/tonne to corporate buyers.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Programme running since 2011; municipal certification from 2019; national J Blue Credit trading since 2021; linked to GX-ETS from 2024.
Staffing & skills
City of Yokohama municipal environment staff, Yokohama Fishing Cooperative divers/monitors, Japan Blue Economy Association registry administrators

Conditions for success

  • municipal ownership and certification of the eelgrass area
  • national registry (JBE) to standardise measurement and issuance
  • corporate offtake demand at a premium price to sustain economics

Common failure modes

  • seagrass carbon uptake hard to measure consistently across seasons/sites
  • 'isoyake' marine-heat die-off threatens credit permanence
  • verification costs weigh heavily on small fishing cooperatives

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal government with national carbon registry
Scale
city/national (Yokohama feeding a nationwide registry)
Income level
high-income (Japan)

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful