evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

PCO AI Legislative Drafting Pilot — New Zealand's generative-AI trial for explanatory notes and consolidations

New Zealand · Wellington · See the New Zealand profile

New Zealand's Parliamentary Counsel Office ran a six-month, five-partner R&D programme fine-tuning an 8-billion-parameter model on 200 examples of NZ legislation to test AI for drafting explanatory notes, consolidating Acts and answering plain-language legislation queries.

Details

Promoter
Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO), New Zealand
Period
2024–2025 (pilot)
Keywords
legislative drafting, generative AI, digital government, parliamentary counsel

Description

New Zealand's Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO), the agency that drafts all government legislation, ran a six-month research-and-development programme in 2024–2025, partnering with five technology companies (including Catalyst IT) to explore generative-AI applications in legislative drafting before making any decision to adopt the technology.

The team tested at least four distinct use cases: drafting clause-by-clause explanatory notes for new bills; generating prospective (draft-updated) consolidations of amended Acts; supporting plain-language legislative writing; and prototyping a chatbot for the New Zealand Legislation website. For the explanatory-notes and consolidation work, PCO fine-tuned a small, 8-billion-parameter open language model on around 200 examples of New Zealand legislative text, rather than relying on a large third-party foundation model.

To keep sensitive legislative data within New Zealand jurisdiction, the proof-of-concept models were deployed on Catalyst Cloud, New Zealand's own sovereign cloud infrastructure. PCO published candid, per-experiment results pages (for example, "How successful is AI at drafting an explanatory note?") rather than only promotional summaries, and explicitly framed the work as exploratory — assessing benefits, risks and limitations before any production rollout. The pilot follows New Zealand's earlier, non-AI "Better Rules"/"Rules as Code" programme (2018 onward), which OECD case studies credit with international influence but which practitioners say stalled for lack of senior sponsorship — a contrast that makes PCO's current, more cautious AI trial notable.

Read the full analysis: https://www.pco.govt.nz/about-us/legislative-data-and-technology

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful