evidoria

What works in New Zealand

All catalogues

41
evaluated practices
58/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 36 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for New Zealand

New Zealand has pursued pay equity and digital inclusion as policy priorities. The Care and Support Workers (Pay Equity) Settlement Act 2017 delivered a NZD 2 billion settlement raising wages for 55,000 predominantly female workers by 15–50%, while the Marae Digital Connectivity Programme has connected 676 of 877 eligible marae to broadband since 2019. Digital accessibility remains a compliance challenge: the Government Web Accessibility Standard made WCAG conformance mandatory in 2010 (first globally), yet a 2018 audit found only 65% average agency compliance. To reach lower-income and older populations, programmes like Skinny Jump (31,776 active connections by July 2024) and SilverTech (97% participant satisfaction) provide subsidised broadband and digital skills training, though evidence on their long-term impact remains limited.

Drawn from: New Zealand Care and Support Workers (Pay Equity) Settlement Act 2017 · New Zealand Government Web Accessibility Standard · Marae Digital Connectivity Programme · SilverTech Smartphone Digital Literacy Course · Skinny Jump – Subsidised Mobile Broadband for Low-Income Households · New Zealand Free Period Products in Schools Programme (Ikura) · Innovating Streets for People — New Zealand's National Tactical-Urbanism Pilot Fund · New Zealand's Ministry of Justice Non-Violence Programme Network

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +36 pts 83 here · 48 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -11 pts 48 here · 59 average

Achievement / evidence -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Transparency, ethics & data protection
83 · 48
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Sustainability (ongoing)
86 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
58 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
71 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
60 · 54
Efficiency
50 · 44
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
9 · 7
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 76
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
52 · 50
Curator validation
75 · 74
Innovation level
62 · 63
Effectiveness
75 · 77
Equity & inclusion
50 · 52
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Transferability / demonstrated replication
55 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Evidence of impact / measured public value
48 · 59
Achievement / evidence
50 · 91

Coloured bar: New Zealand. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

New Zealand Care and Support Workers (Pay Equity) Settlement Act 2017 · 96

New Zealand Government Web Accessibility Standard · 96

Marae Digital Connectivity Programme · 92

SilverTech Smartphone Digital Literacy Course · 88

Skinny Jump – Subsidised Mobile Broadband for Low-Income Households · 88

New Zealand Free Period Products in Schools Programme (Ikura) · 85

Innovating Streets for People — New Zealand's National Tactical-Urbanism Pilot Fund · 81

New Zealand's Ministry of Justice Non-Violence Programme Network · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in New Zealand concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more