evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Portugal's Tribunal de Contas — a Machine-Learning Risk Model to Target Public-Procurement Audits

Portugal · Lisbon · See the Portugal profile · See the Lisbon profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 66% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Portugal's supreme audit institution built a 37-indicator ML risk model to target procurement audits, developed with NOVA IMS, EU funding and OECD support, launched in 2025; the OECD itself flags that impact metrics are not yet published.

10.3 % of GDP
Public procurement share of Portugal's GDP (n/a)
37 indicators
Risk indicators in the audit-targeting model (2025)
2 years
Project development period (2023-2025)
Portugal's Tribunal de Contas — a Machine-Learning Risk Model to Target Public-Procurement Audits

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Tribunal de Contas (Portuguese Court of Auditors), with NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)
Period
2023-2025
Keywords
public procurement, audit, risk-scoring, machine learning, government oversight

Context

Public procurement equals roughly 10.3% of Portugal's GDP, and the Tribunal de Contas, like most supreme audit institutions, historically relied on sampling-based manual review to check contracts for irregularities, limiting how much of total spend could realistically be audited.

Activities

From around 2023, the Tribunal de Contas partnered with NOVA Information Management School, with OECD technical support and European Commission funding, on a two-year project to build a data-driven risk-assessment model. The system applies a risk matrix of 37 indicators — covering award procedures, single-bidder awards, contract modifications, execution delays and cost variation — fed by data integrated from the public procurement institute IMPIC, the registries institute IRN, the Tax Authority and the Competition Authority, alongside the Tribunal's own procurement platforms.

Results

The tool was publicly presented in early 2025 and the OECD cited it as a model example for other audit institutions in a dedicated methodology paper (Working Papers on Public Governance No. 83, June 2025). The OECD's own working paper is explicit that the Tribunal has not yet published hard performance figures — no public accuracy rate, count of contracts flagged, or funds affected.

Conclusions

This is a genuinely deployed practice, but one still at an early, unquantified stage rather than a mature system with a multi-year track record; the OECD recommends the Tribunal begin measuring and publishing impact indicators going forward.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No public budget figure disclosed; described as European Commission-funded over a two-year development period with NOVA IMS and OECD technical support.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Development ran roughly 2023-2025; the model was publicly presented and the OECD paper published in 2025, with no multi-year operational track record yet.
Staffing & skills
Tribunal de Contas (Portuguese Court of Auditors), NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), OECD (technical support)

Conditions for success

  • Integrating data across multiple national institutions (IMPIC, IRN, Tax Authority, Competition Authority) rather than relying on the audit body's own data alone
  • An academic partnership (NOVA IMS) for the underlying methodology
  • OECD technical support to align with recognised audit-risk practice
  • Publishing performance indicators once available, per the OECD's own recommendation, so impact can be independently assessed

Where it fits

Governance type
national supreme audit institution
Scale
national
Income level
high_income

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful