Poznań's water utility Aquanet discounts stormwater fees by roughly 15% for properties that retain over 20% of rainfall on-site, pairing the price signal with municipal grants for rain gardens and retention tanks.
~15%
Stormwater fee discount for retaining over 20% of rainfall on-site (effective Aug 2025)
>20% of rainfall/snowmelt retained on-site
Retention threshold to qualify for the discount
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
Aquanet S.A. / City of Poznań
Period
2021–present
Region (NUTS)
PL41
Keywords
water utility, stormwater fee, green infrastructure, municipal governance
Context
Since around 2021, Poznań's municipal water and sewage utility Aquanet has priced stormwater discharge on a sliding scale: properties with no on-site retention pay the standard rate, while those retaining more than 20% of rainfall and snowmelt on-site qualify for a discount. Aquanet's tariff, effective August 2025, sets combined-sewer discharge at 8.06 PLN/m³ falling to 6.84 PLN/m³, and separate storm-sewer discharge at 7.77 PLN/m³ falling to 6.60 PLN/m³ — a roughly 15% saving for maximal retention. A complementary municipal 'small retention' grant programme covers up to 80% of retention-device costs (up to 50,000 PLN for housing cooperatives, 6,000 PLN for individual households) from a 1 million PLN annual budget.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Municipal small-retention grant budget: 1,000,000 PLN/year, covering up to 80% of device costs (capped at 50,000 PLN for housing cooperatives, 6,000 PLN for individual households).
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Discount tariff operating since around 2021; current rates effective August 2025.
Staffing & skills
Aquanet S.A. (water utility, administers the tariff), City of Poznań (co-runs the small-retention grant programme)
Conditions for success
Property owners installing qualifying on-site retention devices (rain gardens, retention tanks) to reach the >20% retention threshold
Sustained municipal grant budget to offset installation costs and encourage uptake
Public acceptance of stormwater charges — a peer-reviewed comparison notes Warsaw and Kraków have not adopted equivalent fees, citing public resistance
Common failure modes
No published data exists on total impervious area affected or aggregate retention volume achieved city-wide, so measured effectiveness is unverified
Public resistance to new stormwater charges has stopped larger Polish cities (Warsaw, Kraków) from adopting equivalent schemes
Commonly funded by
Own resources / municipal budget
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.