evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Reciprocal Water Agreements (ARA) — Los Negros Watershed Programme, Bolivia

Bolivia · Los Negros, Florida Province · See the Bolivia profile

Since 2003, Fundación Natura Bolivia's reciprocal water agreements have paid upstream farmers in-kind (beehives, seedlings, training) to protect cloud forest; by 2023 the model covered ~24,000 farmers across ~80 municipalities, financed by municipal water tariffs.

Details

Promoter
Fundación Natura Bolivia
Period
2003-present
Keywords
watershed protection, in-kind PES, cloud forest conservation, water funds, municipal co-financing

Description

In 2003, in the village of Los Negros in Bolivia's Santa Cruz Department, Fundación Natura Bolivia piloted a "reciprocal" watershed agreement: rather than cash payments for ecosystem services, downstream irrigators compensated 46 upstream farmers protecting 2,774 hectares of cloud forest with in-kind goods (beehives, fruit tree seedlings, training). The reciprocity framing, and in-kind rather than cash transfers, was chosen partly to work around weak land-tenure documentation that complicated a formal PES contract.

The model scaled steadily: a 2011 trial expansion reached 400 farmers with $158,000 in goods (72% funded by the local water fund), covering part of the Río Grande basin that serves 1.5 million people. By 2019 it covered 8,000 farmers protecting 350,000 hectares across 58 municipalities, and by 2023 the programme — now known nationally as Acuerdos Recíprocos por Agua — reported roughly 24,000 participating farmers protecting close to 600,000 hectares across about 80 municipalities, with 23 municipal protected areas formally created across 20 municipalities, totalling roughly 3.4 million hectares.

Financing has progressively shifted from NGO/donor seed capital toward domestic sources: water users contribute a small monthly tariff (about 1 boliviano), and municipalities allocate a share of local tax revenue and central-government transfers to the water funds that pay farmers.

Caveats: property-rights ambiguity was an explicit obstacle in the original pilot; the programme still relies partly on donor funding to seed new water funds; and while the 2003, 2011 and 2019 milestones are documented by CBD and Ecosystem Marketplace case studies, the most recent (2023) national-scale figures come from a single news source citing the implementing NGO and have not been independently cross-verified. No rigorous counterfactual evaluation of environmental outcomes (e.g. measured deforestation or sedimentation reduction) was found — reported figures are programme outputs (participants, area under contract) rather than independently measured outcomes.

Read the full analysis: https://www.cbd.int/financial/pes/bolivia-pesnegros.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful