evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SWM Öko-Bauern Programme — Mangfall Valley Organic Farming for Drinking Water Protection (Germany)

Germany · Bad Aibling · See the Germany profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 1992 Munich's public utility SWM has paid farmers in the Mangfall Valley catchment to convert to organic farming under 18-year contracts, protecting the city's drinking water from nitrates. 185 farms now cultivate ~4,650 ha organically — one of Germany's largest organic far

185
Farms converted to organic farming
4,650 ha
Land farmed organically in Mangfall catchment
18 years
Farmer contract duration
1992
Programme running since
SWM Öko-Bauern Programme — Mangfall Valley Organic Farming for Drinking Water Protection (Germany)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Stadtwerke München (SWM)
Period
1992-present
Region (NUTS)
DE21
Keywords
watershed protection, organic agriculture, drinking water, avoided-cost PES, nitrate reduction

Context

Munich draws its drinking water untreated from natural springs in the Alpine foothills, most importantly the Mangfall Valley about 40 km southeast of the city. Because the water reaches consumers without filtration, protecting the quality of the source catchment is critical. In 1992, facing rising nitrate pollution risk from intensive farming in the valley, the municipal utility Stadtwerke München (SWM) launched the Öko-Bauern ('organic farmers') programme.

Objectives

The logic is a classic avoided-cost PES: it is cheaper for the utility to prevent nitrate contamination through land-use change than to build and operate treatment infrastructure to remove it afterwards.

Activities

SWM pays farmers within the catchment to convert to certified organic farming — working with the Naturland, Bioland, Biokreis and Demeter associations — under contracts running 18 years, covering income losses during conversion plus ongoing advisory and certification costs.

Results

185 farms have converted since the programme began, and roughly 4,650 hectares are now farmed organically in the Mangfall catchment, one of the largest contiguous organic farming areas in Germany. Munich's drinking water continues to meet the Drinking Water Ordinance's limit values without any dedicated nitrate-removal treatment step.

Conclusions

Published sources reviewed do not include an independent time series of nitrate concentrations before and after the programme, nor a formal counterfactual cost comparison against a hypothetical treatment plant. Even so, comparative academic case-study literature treats Munich alongside New York City's Catskills watershed programme as one of the two best-established reference models for municipal-utility watershed PES, and the scheme has run continuously for over three decades.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Covers farmer income losses during conversion plus ongoing advisory and certification costs across ~4,650 ha and 185 farms under 18-year contracts; no total programme budget figure is published.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Launched 1992 with 18-year farmer contracts; has run continuously for over three decades.
Staffing & skills
Stadtwerke München (SWM) programme staff manage payments and contracts, Naturland, Bioland, Biokreis and Demeter associations provide certification and advisory support to farmers

Conditions for success

  • long-term 18-year contracts giving farmers income security through the organic conversion period
  • utility direct funding covering income losses plus certification/advisory costs
  • partnership with established organic certification bodies (Naturland, Bioland, Biokreis, Demeter)

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal utility-funded PES
Scale
catchment/valley (Mangfall Valley, ~4,650 ha)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful