evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Returns to Capital — A Randomised Test of Cash and Equipment Grants for Sri Lankan Microenterprises

Sri Lanka · Galle · See the Sri Lanka profile

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial Top 83% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Researchers gave randomised cash or equipment grants to small Sri Lankan firms in the tsunami-hit south, then tracked profits. Average real return to capital was 4.6-5.7% a month, above market rates -- but held only for male-owned firms; female-owned firms saw no gain.

4.6-5.7 % per month
Average monthly real return to capital
55-63 % per year
Average annual real return to capital

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
University of California San Diego, Stanford University & World Bank (de Mel, McKenzie, Woodruff research team)
Period
2005-2007 (post-tsunami baseline; grants disbursed in three rounds with follow-up surveys)
Keywords
microenterprise finance, access to capital, applied development-economics research

Context

In the tsunami-hit districts of Galle, Matara and Kalutara on Sri Lanka's southern coast, researchers from UC San Diego, Stanford University and the World Bank designed a field experiment to test whether small firms are held back by credit constraints or by genuinely low returns on capital.

Objectives

The study aimed to measure how profits respond when microenterprises with fewer than one paid employee receive an unconditional capital injection, compared to a control group that received no grant.

Activities

Researchers randomly assigned cash or in-kind equipment grants of roughly 10,000-20,000 Sri Lankan rupees to microenterprises, then tracked profits through repeated follow-up surveys against the untreated control group.

Results

The average real return to capital came out at 4.6% to 5.7% a month (55-63% a year), far above bank lending rates, but the effect disappeared entirely for female-owned enterprises even though male- and female-owned firms looked similar before the grant.

Conclusions

The trial is a landmark in the microenterprise-finance literature and has been replicated with variations elsewhere, but it remained a research field experiment rather than an operating programme, and its stark gender gap in returns cautions against treating capital access as a universal fix for microenterprise growth.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Cash or in-kind equipment grants of roughly 10,000-20,000 Sri Lankan rupees per firm.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Grants distributed once, with profit outcomes tracked over repeated follow-up survey rounds across about two years.
Staffing & skills
Academic research team from UC San Diego, Stanford University and the World Bank, Local survey enumerators for follow-up rounds

Conditions for success

  • Male-owned firms
  • Higher owner business ability
  • Greater household wealth

Common failure modes

  • No positive return to capital found for female-owned enterprises, despite similar pre-grant characteristics
  • Effects measured only about two years post-grant; long-run persistence unknown

Where it fits

Governance type
academic research trial, not government-run
Scale
individual microenterprise (roughly 400 firms)
Income level
low-income, disaster-affected region

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 91

Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn)

Estonia

Estonia's largest science park runs a startup incubator and themed accelerators (NATO DIANA, ESA BIC, AI, cyber) that have supported …