Anoppi — Finland's AI Tool for Anonymising Court and Authority Decisions Before Publication
Finland
Finland's Ministry of Justice, with the University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Statistics Finland, built Anoppi — an open-source tool …
Estonia · Tallinn · See the Estonia profile · See the Tallinn profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 12% 80/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Estonia's RIK, working with language-tech firm TEXTA, built an NER tool that automatically redacts names, IDs and addresses from court rulings — used to anonymise and republish nearly 80,000 historic decisions, though no independent accuracy audit is public.
EE001Estonian court decisions must have personal data removed before publication in the public Court Information System, but manually redacting long rulings — some running to more than 50 pages with multiple names, ID codes, birth dates, addresses, phone numbers, IBANs and email addresses — is slow and error-prone. The Centre of Registers and Information Systems (RIK), the government IT agency under Estonia's Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, commissioned language-technology company TEXTA OÜ to automate the process.
TEXTA built a hybrid pipeline combining a statistical Conditional Random Fields model, a neural Stanford Stanza named-entity-recognition model, and rule-based regex extractors for structured identifiers such as emails, IBANs and ID codes, trained on a custom-annotated corpus of Estonian court texts. RIK used the tool to anonymise and republish nearly 80,000 historic court decisions in the Court Information System, a backlog that would have been impractical to clear manually.
In TEXTA's own benchmark, the resulting model tagged 99% more personal names and roughly three times more organisation names than Estonia's existing open-source EstNER model on the same court-case dataset. In January 2026, the European Commission's Interoperable Europe Portal featured the tool in its Justice & AI Toolbox collection as a reusable good practice for other EU member states building similar court-transparency systems.
No independent, third-party accuracy audit of the anonymisation model — covering, for example, its miss rate on rare name formats or non-standard layouts — has been published by RIK, TEXTA or the Ministry, and the reported precision/recall figures come from TEXTA's own internal benchmark rather than a court-ordered evaluation, so the residual risk of an unredacted personal detail slipping through is not independently quantified.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Finland
Finland's Ministry of Justice, with the University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Statistics Finland, built Anoppi — an open-source tool …
United Kingdom
FOI documents revealed the UK Ministry of Justice built a predictive-policing tool with the Home Office and two police forces, …
Norway
NTNU piloted Microsoft 365 Copilot in spring 2024 inside Datatilsynet's sandbox; its exit report gave eight findings and concluded NTNU …
Slovenia
Slovenia's ZIUDHPUI law requires every public body to disclose the AI systems it uses via the SPOT portal into a …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.