evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Slovenia's Statutory Registry of AI Systems in the Public Sector

Slovenia · Ljubljana · See the Slovenia profile · See the Ljubljana profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 24% 73/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Slovenia's ZIUDHPUI law requires every public body to disclose the AI systems it uses via the SPOT portal into a public dataset, while civil-society group Danes je nov dan independently tracks what agencies fail to report.

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Ministry for Digital Transformation of Slovenia
Period
2025-ongoing
Keywords
digital government, data protection, algorithmic transparency

Context

Slovenia's Law on the Implementation of the EU Regulation on Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (ZIUDHPUI) requires every public-sector body using an AI system to report it to the state via the SPOT e-government portal.

Activities

Reports must include the organisation's name, the system's name and purpose, its algorithmic operating principles, a data-protection impact assessment, and (for high-risk systems) a fundamental-rights impact assessment. The Ministry for Digital Transformation publishes results as an open dataset under CC BY 4.0, last updated May 2026. Independently, civil-society group Danes je nov dan launched its own Public Sector AI Registry in November 2024, compiling cases from public sources and information requests.

Results

Two independent, cross-checking disclosure channels now exist — the statutory registry and Danes je nov dan's civil-society registry.

Conclusions

Neither registry currently publishes a count of listed systems or compliance rate, and Danes je nov dan describes its own registry as still in early stages covering only the most significant known cases — the practice's real coverage has not yet been measured.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ministry for Digital Transformation of Slovenia, Danes je nov dan (civil-society, EDRi member)

Conditions for success

  • Statutory reporting obligation (ZIUDHPUI) with a defined data schema
  • Independent civil-society registry as a cross-check

Common failure modes

  • No published compliance rate or system count from either registry

Commonly funded by

Digital Europe Programme National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful