evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SBRI — the UK's Small Business Research Initiative, Reviewed and Relaunched Twice

United Kingdom · Swindon · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Swindon profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The UK's SBRI has awarded over GBP 500M in R&D contracts to SMEs since 2001, with an independent 2017 study crediting GBP 2.4 of economic benefit per GBP 1 spent, but a government-commissioned 2015 review found funding down 25% and 85% of contracts too small to matter.

500+ million GBP
Cumulative R&D contracts awarded
2.4 GBP
Economic benefit per GBP1 of funding (2017)
63 million GBP
Programme funding, 2015-16 (2015-16)
SBRI — the UK's Small Business Research Initiative, Reviewed and Relaunched Twice

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Innovate UK (UK Research and Innovation / UKRI), delivering on behalf of public bodies including the NHS, Ministry of Defence and DEFRA
Period
2001-present (overhauled 2008-2009; current branding 'Contracts for Innovation')
Keywords
SME innovation funding, public procurement of innovation, R&D contracts

Context

SBRI launched in 2001 following interest in the US SBIR model, was overhauled in 2008-2009 under the newly formed Technology Strategy Board, and is now delivered by Innovate UK (rebranded 'Contracts for Innovation') on behalf of bodies including the NHS, Ministry of Defence and DEFRA, through 100%-funded Phase 1 feasibility and Phase 2 prototype contracts.

Results

Since inception the programme has awarded over GBP500 million in R&D contracts. SMEs make up ~70% of applicants and ~60% of awarded value. A 2017 Manchester Institute evaluation found every GBP1 of SBRI funding produced at least GBP2.4 of UK economic benefit; the NHS's SBRI Healthcare sub-programme separately reports GBP1.2-1.8 billion in cumulative healthcare cost savings.

Conclusions

A 2015 review commissioned by 10 Downing Street found funding had fallen to GBP63 million (a 25% year-on-year drop) and ~85% of contracts were below the minimum size needed for meaningful benefit, with most departments giving the programme only lip service; the 2017 evaluation that found the GBP2.4-per-GBP1 benefit also concluded SBRI 'has not been as effective as expected' at commercialisation, and a 2022 UKRI evaluation again called for more systematic programme management.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Innovate UK / UK Research and Innovation, NHS, Ministry of Defence and DEFRA (client departments)

Conditions for success

  • Clear departmental ownership of SBRI schemes
  • Contract sizes large enough to deliver meaningful benefit

Common failure modes

  • 25% year-on-year funding drop by 2015-16
  • ~85% of contracts below minimum effective size
  • Most departments giving only 'lip service' per the 2015 review

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 91

Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn)

Estonia

Estonia's largest science park runs a startup incubator and themed accelerators (NATO DIANA, ESA BIC, AI, cyber) that have supported …