evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SCORE Egypt — ILO–FEI Pilot for SME Productivity and Working Conditions

Egypt · Banha · See the Egypt profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 83% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

ILO and Egypt's Federation of Industries piloted SCORE lean-management training with 30 engineering and chemical SMEs in Qalioubia and Menoufia; most reported cost savings, fewer defects and better working conditions, prompting a EUR2.5m Italian-funded scale-up to new sectors.

~30
SMEs enrolled in pilot (2018)
90%
Enterprise satisfaction rate
EUR2.5 million
Scale-up funding (AICS) (3-year project)
104,000+
FEI member enterprises represented

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
International Labour Organization (ILO) / Federation of Egyptian Industries (FEI)
Period
2018–2024
Keywords
manufacturing, engineering, chemicals, SME development

Context

Egypt's manufacturing SMEs have long struggled with low productivity and informal management practices, despite the Federation of Egyptian Industries (FEI) representing over 104,000 industrial enterprises and about 18% of the national economy. In 2018 the International Labour Organization (ILO) and FEI launched a pilot of ILO's SCORE Training methodology, combining classroom instruction with in-factory coaching on workplace cooperation, quality improvement and resource efficiency.

Objectives

The pilot aimed to test whether SCORE's combination of classroom training and in-factory coaching could improve workplace cooperation, quality and resource efficiency in Egyptian SMEs, as a basis for wider scale-up.

Activities

The pilot enrolled roughly 30 SMEs in the engineering and chemical industries across Qalioubia and Menoufia governorates, combining classroom instruction with in-factory coaching.

Results

Reported outcomes included a 90% enterprise satisfaction rate, with the majority of participating firms citing cost savings, fewer product defects and fewer worker complaints after training. The pilot's results helped attract further donor support: the Italian Agency for Development Cooperation (AICS) funded a EUR2.5 million, three-year 'Productivity Ecosystems for Decent Work' project extending the SCORE approach to Egypt's leather-tanning cluster in Robbiki and marble cluster in Shaq Al-Thu'ban, with a preliminary assessment of the furniture industry.

Conclusions

The evidence base here is a self-reported pilot survey of a modest sample (about 30 firms) rather than an independently audited productivity study; ILO's global SCORE results (up to 50% productivity gains across 15 countries) should not be assumed to transfer one-to-one to the smaller Egyptian pilot.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — EUR2.5 million, three-year AICS-funded expansion phase following the initial pilot.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — 2018 pilot; AICS-funded three-year expansion (leather cluster Robbiki, marble cluster Shaq Al-Thu'ban, preliminary furniture-sector assessment) reported through 2024.
Staffing & skills
ILO SCORE trainers/in-factory coaches, Federation of Egyptian Industries (FEI) staff

Conditions for success

  • partnership between ILO (methodology/trainers) and a national employer federation (FEI) for enterprise access
  • donor funding (AICS) to move from pilot to multi-cluster scale-up

Common failure modes

  • reliance on self-reported outcomes without independent audit; the pilot's modest ~30-firm sample limits generalisability; continuation depends on continued donor (AICS) funding

Where it fits

Governance type
ILO technical cooperation with a national employer federation
Scale
regional pilot (Qalioubia, Menoufia governorates), expanding to a multi-cluster national programme

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful