evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Sherbro River Estuary Blue-Carbon Agreement — Carbon-Justice Mangrove Protection (Sierra Leone)

Sierra Leone · Bonthe · See the Sierra Leone profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 58% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In October 2025, 124 communities on Sierra Leone's Sherbro Island signed a 50-year blue-carbon deal with developer West Africa Blue to protect ~79,000 hectares of mangroves, guaranteeing communities 40-52.5% of gross carbon-credit revenue under 'carbon justice' principles.

124 communities
Communities party to the agreement (October 2025)
79,000 hectares
Mangrove area covered by the agreement (2025 agreement)
>3 million tCO2e
Potential lifetime carbon impact (50-year agreement)
40-52.5 %
Community share of gross carbon-credit revenue (varies by phase)
7.5-15 %
Sierra Leone government share of gross carbon-credit revenue (varies by phase)
2,500+ cookstoves
Efficient cookstoves distributed (as of reporting (2025))
1.7 % per year
Annual mangrove deforestation rate before the agreement (since 2012)
Sherbro River Estuary Blue-Carbon Agreement — Carbon-Justice Mangrove Protection (Sierra Leone)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
West Africa Blue, with Namati Sierra Leone and Verra
Period
October 2025 signing; 50-year agreement, first credit sales expected end of 2026
Keywords
blue carbon, mangrove conservation, community forestry, carbon markets

Context

Sierra Leone's Sherbro River Estuary holds roughly half of the country's remaining mangrove forest, though deforestation there has run at about 1.7% a year since 2012. In October 2025, 124 communities across the estuary signed a 50-year benefit-sharing agreement with West Africa Blue, a Mauritius-based project developer, covering protection of an estimated 79,000 hectares of mangroves.

Activities

Namati Sierra Leone, a US-based legal-empowerment NGO, spent roughly three years helping communities negotiate the deal using six 'carbon justice' principles drawn from a global network of grassroots organisations' past experience with carbon projects. A tripartite Community Benefit Organisation - three community, three company and three independent representatives - oversees fund management, and the project is certified to Verra's methodology using a conservative baseline.

Results

The agreement has a potential lifetime impact of more than 3 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent. Communities are guaranteed 40-52.5% of gross carbon-credit revenue (varying by phase), with the Sierra Leone government receiving 7.5-15% and community payments disclosed within 45 days of any credit sale. More than 2,500 efficient cookstoves have already been distributed to reduce reliance on mangrove wood for fuel, with fish-drying ovens and processing equipment planned next.

Conclusions

Reporting on the deal is candid about the risks: Verra has previously faced scrutiny after research found some of its terrestrial forest-carbon projects delivered far fewer climate benefits than claimed, the buyer framework contains no explicit exclusion of fossil-fuel companies, and Sierra Leone's post-civil-war history of land grabs has left communities wary. No credits have yet been sold, and the project's real-world carbon and biodiversity outcomes remain to be independently verified.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — 50-year agreement signed October 2025; first carbon-credit sales expected by end of 2026.
Staffing & skills
West Africa Blue (Mauritius-based project developer) leads the project, Namati Sierra Leone (legal-empowerment NGO) spent roughly three years supporting community negotiation, Tripartite Community Benefit Organisation (three community, three company and three independent representatives) oversees fund management

Conditions for success

  • Six 'carbon justice' principles applied from a global network of grassroots organisations' prior carbon-project experience
  • Multi-year (roughly three-year) community negotiation process before signing, addressing historical wariness from Sierra Leone's post-civil-war land-grab history
  • Transparent, tiered revenue-sharing (40-52.5% to communities) with payment disclosure within 45 days of any credit sale
  • Early non-carbon benefits (cookstoves) delivered before any carbon-credit revenue materialises

Common failure modes

  • Verra, the certifying standard, has previously faced serious scrutiny after research found some of its terrestrial forest-carbon projects delivered far fewer climate benefits than claimed
  • No explicit exclusion of fossil-fuel companies as credit purchasers in the buyer framework
  • No credits have yet been sold and real-world carbon/biodiversity outcomes remain unverified
  • Sierra Leone's post-civil-war history of land grabs by outside investors has left communities wary

Commonly funded by

LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful