evidoria

← Back to browse

Literature / resource Imported

Situația femeilor și a bărbaților în poziții de decizie în administrația publică centrală

Romania · Bucharest · National · See the Romania profile · See the Bucharest profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 99% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

This analysis takes as its starting point the annual update of the database on the situation of women and men in leadership positions . It response to political, economical and social power, because it does an study about comparable for women and men in managerial positions for p

714
Central-government decision-making posts (2021) (2021)
111
Vacant decision-making posts (2021)
84.5%
Occupancy rate of decision-making posts (2021)
53.9%
Women among central-government decision-makers (2021)
46.1%
Men among central-government decision-makers (2021)
-0.4pp
Change in women's share of decision-making posts vs. 2020 (2020-2021)

Details

Promoter
Agenția Națională pentru Egalitatea de Șanse între Femei și Bărbați (ANES) — website
Power domain
Political Power
Methods / tools
Awareness-raising
Region (NUTS)
RO32
Keywords
politics, women, equality, data

Context

Annual update (2021) of the Romanian database on women and men in decision-making positions, produced by the National Agency for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men (ANES). Covers politics, public administration, judiciary, business and finance, social partners and NGOs, environment and media, with a particular focus on political power and central public administration.

Results

At central level, there were 714 decision-making posts in 2021 (111 vacant), an occupancy rate of 84.5%. Of occupied posts, 46.1% of decision-makers were men and 53.9% were women — women outnumbered men by 7.8 percentage points. Compared with 2020 (54.3% women), the share of women in decision-making posts fell slightly by 0.4 pp in 2021.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 96

Women Political Leaders

Belgium

Women Political Leaders (WPL) is the global network of women politicians. The mission of WPL is to increase both the …

★ 37

INSPIRE Campaign School

Ireland

This programme wants to support women that are working in political representation to work with them on key areas that …