evidoria

What works in Romania

All catalogues

64
evaluated practices
42/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 60 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Romania

Romania has implemented several digital-inclusion and anti-corruption initiatives with measurable reach. Digital Skills Academy and Digitaliada have trained teachers and reached over 5,600 students across rural and marginalized communities, with self-reported perception data showing 94–96% of parents and teachers found digital tools beneficial for learning. At the governance level, PREVENT, an AI anti-corruption system, has screened over 100,000 procurement procedures worth RON 72 billion and blocked EUR 108 million in suspect contracts, reducing undisclosed conflicts by 52% within 2.5 years. Com'ON Cluj-Napoca pioneered online participatory budgeting for youth, with 18,872 participants voting on 437 youth initiatives in 2015, later scaling to involve over 50,000 voters and EUR 550,000 in municipal investment. However, most evidence relies on programme reports or self-reported data rather than independent evaluations.

Drawn from: Digital Skills Academy — Accenture Romania & Roma Education Fund Partnership · Com'ON Cluj-Napoca — Romania's First City-Scale Online Youth Participatory Budget · Digitaliada · PREVENT — Romania's AI system for early detection of conflicts of interest in public procurement · Digital literacy for seniors [Alfabetizare digitală pentru seniori] · Digital StoryTelling - Bridge Between Generations · Adopt a School! · Coding for Kids in Libraries (CODE Kids)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +68 pts 100 here · 32 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +14 pts 52 here · 38 average

Inclusiveness / equity +13 pts 56 here · 43 average

Documented learning +10 pts 85 here · 74 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Equity & inclusion +10 pts 59 here · 50 average

Demonstrated reach +9 pts 85 here · 76 average

Weaknesses

Scalability -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -12 pts 46 here · 57 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -14 pts 40 here · 54 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -20 pts 28 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -34 pts 15 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 32
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Teacher capability & pedagogy
52 · 38
Inclusiveness / equity
56 · 43
Documented learning
85 · 74
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Equity & inclusion
59 · 50
Demonstrated reach
85 · 76
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
89 · 89
Governance, certification & transferability
64 · 64
Achievement / evidence
86 · 87
Innovation level
60 · 62
Curator validation
71 · 73
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 47
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 27
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Sustainability
71 · 78
Scalability
53 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured results
46 · 57
Transparency, fairness & accountability
40 · 54
Transferability / replicability
44 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
28 · 48
Evaluation evidence
15 · 49

Coloured bar: Romania. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital Skills Academy — Accenture Romania & Roma Education Fund Partnership · 92

Com'ON Cluj-Napoca — Romania's First City-Scale Online Youth Participatory Budget · 76

Digitaliada · 76

PREVENT — Romania's AI system for early detection of conflicts of interest in public procurement · 73

Digital literacy for seniors [Alfabetizare digitală pentru seniori] · 72

Digital StoryTelling - Bridge Between Generations · 72

Adopt a School! · 72

Coding for Kids in Libraries (CODE Kids) · 72

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Romania concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more