What works in Bucharest
All catalogues · Romania profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}Strengths
Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +47 pts 100 here · 53 average
Equity & inclusion +29 pts 83 here · 54 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Governance, certification & transferability +23 pts 89 here · 66 average
Evidence of learning impact +20 pts 50 here · 30 average
Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average
Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average
Weaknesses
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average
Evaluation evidence -11 pts 25 here · 36 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Scalability beyond pilot -13 pts 53 here · 66 average
Transferability / replicability -22 pts 38 here · 59 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Bucharest. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Digital Skills Academy — Accenture Romania & Roma Education Fund Partnership · 92
PREVENT — Romania's AI system for early detection of conflicts of interest in public procurement · 73
Coding for Kids in Libraries (CODE Kids) · 72
Coalition for Gender Equality / Coalitia Pentru Egalitate de Gen · 70
AI Generation — UiPath Foundation's free AI-literacy curriculum for Romanian high schools · 67
Romania PNDR High Nature Value Meadow Payments — Agri-Environment-Climate Measure 10 · 60
Knowledge Economy Project · 56
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100
- Matches your scale
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more