evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Snote Manager — DR Congo's AI-Assisted State Exam Correction System Cuts the Wait for Results From 45 Days to a Few

Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) · Kinshasa · See the Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) profile · See the Kinshasa profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 62% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The DRC's Ministry of National Education replaced its ageing Data Scan software with Snote Manager, an AI-assisted system for correcting State Examination papers across six regional centres, cutting the wait for results from 45 days to a matter of days.

45 days to a few days
Results turnaround time
10-15x
Scanning speed improvement
6
Scanning centres deployed
Snote Manager — DR Congo's AI-Assisted State Exam Correction System Cuts the Wait for Results From 45 Days to a Few

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Ministry of National Education and New Citizenship (Ministère de l'Enseignement National et Nouvelle Citoyenneté) — General Inspectorate of Education
Period
installed April 2025
Keywords
education administration, public sector digitalisation

Context

The DRC's State Examination (EXETAT) results historically took ~45 days to publish, as answer sheets were manually scanned and graded nationwide.

Activities

On 10 April 2025, the Ministry of National Education installed Snote Manager, replacing Data Scan software, embedding AI-assisted correction across six decentralised scanning centres (Kinshasa, Lubumbashi, Mbuji-Mayi, Kisangani, Gemena, Butembo).

Results

The ministry reports the system scans 10-15x faster than before, and results are now published within a few days rather than 45.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
General Inspectorate of Education experts, decentralised scanning-centre operators

Conditions for success

  • continued General Inspectorate supervision of AI-assisted correction to control grader-fatigue/subjectivity errors

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful