evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Subtropical Thicket Restoration — Carbon-Finance-Backed Spekboom Recovery in South Africa's Karoo

South Africa · Kirkwood · See the South Africa profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2004, South Africa has replanted spekboom across ~800,000 hectares of degraded Karoo rangeland; a 2024 World Bank outcome bond and 2026 UN flagship status drew $75m+ in carbon finance, but researchers warn of overplanting and opaque accounting.

~800,000 hectares
Total area under restoration across South Africa (as of 2026, target for 2030)
2,000 to ~30,000 hectares
Government-led planting growth (last three years to 2026)
8 US$ million
Initial government investment (from 2004)
10,000 hectares
World Bank outcome bond first phase (2024, 14-year bond)
~500 US$ million
Projected community revenue over 40 years (projected, 40-year horizon)
up to 8 million tonnes CO2/year
Potential annual CO2 sequestration at full thicket revival (UNEP estimate)
Subtropical Thicket Restoration — Carbon-Finance-Backed Spekboom Recovery in South Africa's Karoo

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Subtropical Thicket Restoration Programme, with Nat Carbon, EcoPlanet Bamboo and World Bank-structured outcome bond investors
Period
2004-present (national programme); 2024-present (World Bank outcome-bond phase)
Keywords
biodiversity restoration, carbon removal, rangeland restoration, ecosystem finance

Context

South Africa's Subtropical Thicket Restoration Programme began in 2004 with about $8 million of government investment to replant spekboom (Portulacaria afra), a hardy succulent that once formed dense thicket across the semi-arid Eastern Cape before over a century of goat overgrazing stripped it bare. Spekboom stores carbon in its leaves, roots and surrounding soil, and UNEP credits thicket restoration with 'extremely high' biodiversity benefits.

Activities

Restoration has accelerated sharply since 2023: government-led planting grew from about 2,000 to roughly 30,000 hectares, private developers added a further 25,000 hectares, and more than 60 entities now work across an estimated 800,000 hectares. In 2024 the World Bank structured a 14-year outcome bond funding a 10,000-hectare first phase (with a planned expansion to 50,000 hectares), backed by GenZero, Mirova, Rubicon Carbon and Bregal Sphere and placed by BNP Paribas, with Amazon committing to buy carbon removal units at a fixed price over multiple decades.

Results

In December 2025 the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration named the programme a World Restoration Flagship, citing a UNEP estimate that full thicket revival could sequester up to 8 million tonnes of CO2 annually — comparable to about 20 gas-fired power plants — with a 2030 transformation target of 800,000 hectares. Developers project roughly $500 million could flow to local farming communities over 40 years through wages, land rental, carbon-credit revenue sharing and small-business development.

Conclusions

Independent reporting is candid about the strain of rapid scale-up: researcher Jan Vlok warns some companies plant at 100% density (which he calls 'forestation' rather than restoration, against a recommended 70–80% or lower), projects reportedly operate in silos with little shared protocol, and a 2026 Mongabay investigation found the sector's investment and accounting practices run on 'closed books', difficult for outsiders to verify.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — About $8 million in initial government investment from 2004; the 2024 World Bank-structured outcome bond mobilised further private carbon finance on top of $75m+ in carbon finance drawn in overall by the sector (exact bond size not itemised in sources).
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Programme running since 2004; sharp acceleration from 2023; 14-year World Bank outcome bond from 2024; national 800,000-hectare target for 2030.
Staffing & skills
Subtropical Thicket Restoration Programme (government-led), Nat Carbon, EcoPlanet Bamboo, World Bank / GenZero, Mirova, Rubicon Carbon, Bregal Sphere (outcome-bond investors), BNP Paribas (placement), Amazon (offtake)

Conditions for success

  • Independently structured outcome bond tying investor payment to verified carbon removal
  • Fixed-price, multi-decade carbon-offtake agreement (Amazon) giving financiers confidence
  • Recommended planting density of 70–80% cover (rather than 100%) per restoration researchers

Common failure modes

  • Some operators plant at 100% density — 'forestation' rather than restoration, per researcher Jan Vlok
  • Projects reported to operate in silos with little shared protocol knowledge
  • Wage disputes linked to payment through contractor intermediaries
  • 2026 Mongabay investigation found sector accounting opaque ('closed books'), with investment claims hard to verify

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful