evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Sweden Nature Conservation Agreements — Naturvårdsavtal

Sweden · Jönköping · See the Sweden profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Swedish Forest Agency pays private owners for 50-year agreements (Naturvårdsavtal) protecting old-growth forest. End 2025: 35,500 ha NCA, 76,600 ha NCA+BPA; SEK 23,000/ha avg. Peer-reviewed biodiversity gains across 25+ years. Note: new enrolments at historic low.

35,500 ha
Forest protected under Nature Conservation Agreements (NCA) (end 2025)
76,600 ha
Combined NCA+BPA protected forest (end 2025)
23,000 SEK/ha
Average NCA compensation (2025)
>600,000,000 SEK
Cumulative NCA compensation expenditure (1998–2025)
995 ha
New NCA area enrolled (2025)
7.2 ha
Average NCA/BPA patch size
Sweden Nature Conservation Agreements — Naturvårdsavtal

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Swedish Forest Agency (Skogsstyrelsen)
Period
1998–present
Keywords
forest conservation, biodiversity, private landowners, old-growth, state payments

Context

Sweden's Nature Conservation Agreements (Naturvårdsavtal, NCA) are voluntary 50-year contracts between the Swedish Forest Agency and private forest owners, running since 1998. Landowners agree to refrain from commercial felling and to manage their forest for biodiversity — retaining dead wood, old trees and structural complexity — in exchange for compensation payments equal to the estimated timber value foregone.

Objectives

Protect old-growth and biodiversity-rich forest on private land without compulsory purchase, complementing formal nature reserves with a voluntary, negotiated instrument.

Activities

The Swedish Forest Agency negotiates and administers individual 50-year NCA contracts with private landowners, compensating them for foregone timber value. A companion instrument, Biotope Protection Areas (BPA), covers additional forest under a related mechanism. Annual statistics on area, compensation and enrolment are published transparently by the agency.

Results

By end 2025, more than 35,500 hectares of productive forest were under NCA agreements, with the companion Biotope Protection Area (BPA) instrument covering a further 34,600 hectares — a combined NCA+BPA network of 76,600 hectares. Average NCA compensation in 2025 stood at approximately SEK 23,000 per hectare, and cumulative NCA compensation expenditure since inception has exceeded SEK 600 million. Peer-reviewed research (Svensson et al., Restoration Ecology 2025) confirms that NCA and BPA patches, while individually small (average 7.2 ha per patch), collectively make significant contributions to landscape-level biodiversity conservation, particularly for old-growth-dependent species such as saproxylic beetles and lichens.

Conclusions

The NCA model is a cost-efficient approach to private-land conservation that has been cited in international literature as replicable and has inspired similar schemes elsewhere in the Nordic and Central European region. Its growth is nonetheless constrained: new annual enrolments have fallen to a historic low (995 ha added in 2025) because the same budget is increasingly diverted to compensating landowners for denied logging permits in montane forests, a governance tension that limits further programme expansion.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Average compensation approximately SEK 23,000/ha in 2025; cumulative expenditure since 1998 exceeds SEK 600 million; funded through the national forest agency budget, which increasingly competes with compensation for logging-permit denials.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — 50-year individual contracts; programme running continuously since 1998 (27+ years), though annual new enrolment has slowed sharply in recent years.
Staffing & skills
Swedish Forest Agency (Skogsstyrelsen) staff for valuation and contracting, private forest owners

Conditions for success

  • negotiated compensation matching foregone timber value
  • voluntary landowner participation
  • stable long-term (50-year) funding commitment
  • transparent annual public reporting

Common failure modes

  • new enrolments have fallen to a historic low as the same budget is increasingly diverted to compensating landowners for denied logging permits in montane forests, limiting further programme growth

Where it fits

Governance type
national government payment scheme, administered by a state forest agency
Scale
national, private forest landowners
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 53

Helmi Habitats Programme (Finland)

Finland

Voluntary, state-funded Finnish programme (2020–2030) protecting and restoring mires, wetlands, traditional biotopes and shores; 27,770 ha of mires protected and …