evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

T-Hub — Telangana's State-Backed Startup Innovation Campus

India · Hyderabad · See the India profile

Telangana's T-Hub, a state-backed innovation campus in Hyderabad launched in 2015, reports 4,100+ startups supported and $2bn+ funding facilitated. These are T-Hub's own organisational figures, not independently audited, and have shifted markedly across years of self-reporting.

4,100+
Startups supported (cumulative, T-Hub self-reported) (early 2026)
25,000+
Jobs created (early 2026)
2,000,000,000+ USD
Funding facilitated to portfolio companies (early 2026)
~1,120-1,300
Startups supported (2021-2022 press coverage) (2021-2022)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
T-Hub, in partnership with the Government of Telangana, IIIT Hyderabad, ISB and NALSAR
Period
2015-2026
Keywords
startup incubation, innovation ecosystems, public-private R&D partnerships

Context

T-Hub is a Hyderabad startup-incubation campus launched 5 November 2015 as a public-private partnership between the Government of Telangana, IIIT-Hyderabad, ISB and NALSAR, expanding in June 2022 into a ~572,000 sq ft 'T-Hub 2.0' campus; programmes include Lab32, T-Angel, T-Bridge and the NITI-Aayog-backed AIC T-Hub Foundation.

Results

As of early 2026, T-Hub reports supporting 4,100+ startups (1,750+ between Jan 2024-Feb 2026 alone), creating 25,000+ jobs and facilitating $2 billion+ in funding to portfolio companies via a 337+ person mentor network. Alumni include Zenoti (India's first vertical-SaaS unicorn, $160m Series D in 2020) and MyGate.

Conclusions

Reported scale has shifted markedly year to year: 2021-2022 coverage cited ~1,120-1,300 startups and ~Rs 1,800 crore invested; 2023-2024 coverage cited '~2,000' startups and Rs 2,269 crore raised by named alumni; the 4,100+ figure appeared only in 2026 reporting. All headline totals originate from T-Hub's own disclosures rather than an independent audit, and no randomised or matched-comparison study of T-Hub's effect on founder outcomes was found — the scale of upward revision is itself a reason for caution in treating any single number as precise.

Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
T-Hub programme and mentor network (337+ mentors)

Conditions for success

  • Public-private-academic partnership structure (government + 3 academic institutions)
  • Purpose-built large-scale campus (T-Hub 2.0)

Common failure modes

  • Headline metrics have been revised sharply upward across years without a clear reconciling methodology
  • No independent audit or comparison-based evaluation of founder/firm outcomes exists

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful