evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Tanzania's National Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Education

Tanzania · Dodoma · See the Tanzania profile

Tanzania's Ministry of Education issued national guidelines (Jan 2025) requiring every school and university to adopt its own AI-use framework covering privacy, ethics and student well-being. Analysts praise the intent but flag weak enforcement and foreign-data dependency risks.

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Tanzania)
Period
Jan 2025–present
Keywords
education, AI governance, data protection, policy, ethics

Description

In January 2025, Tanzania's Ministry of Education, Science and Technology published the National Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Education, aligned with the country's National Digital Education Strategy 2024/25–2029/30. The guidelines direct every educational institution, from primary schools to universities, to develop its own AI-use framework addressing data privacy, security, ethics and student well-being, with periodic review as technology changes, and recommend a 'blended learning' approach in which AI supports rather than replaces teacher judgement.

Tanzania is among a small number of African countries to issue education-specific AI guidance at the national level, complementing the country's broader 2025 AI Readiness Assessment (with UNESCO) and the Ministry of Information, Communication and Information Technology's separate ethical-use guidelines. The framework is explicitly precautionary: it does not mandate specific tools or vendors, leaving implementation design to individual institutions.

An independent analysis published by Tanzanian outlet The Chanzo (May 2026) welcomed the guidelines' recognition that AI could 'widen the chasm between the haves and have-nots or become a bridge', but warned of three gaps: no open-source or data-sovereignty requirement (risking dependence on foreign systems storing children's data overseas), a monitoring mechanism without enforcement powers, and the 'irreversibility' of poor AI deployment compared with reversible curriculum changes. The guidelines' strength lies in agenda-setting and explicit ethics language; its evidenced weakness is the absence of a funded, accountable oversight body.

Read the full analysis: http://www.moe.go.tz/sites/default/files/NATIONAL%20GUIDELINES%20FOR%20ARTIFICIAL%20INTELIGENCE%20N%20EDUCATION.pdf

Read the full analysis: http://www.moe.go.tz/sites/default/files/NATIONAL%20GUIDELINES%20FOR%20ARTIFICIAL%20INTELIGENCE%20N%20EDUCATION.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful